Fiction -- History and criticism; Political fiction -- History and criticism; Politics in literature
The second criterion for classifying political groups mentioned at
the beginning of this chapter was that of overt political behavior.
The political novel describes the behavior of the group to which
its characters belong, that group which, while seeking office or
discharging it, conforms to a set of rules both written and unwritten.
From one point of view, these seem almost like the rules for playing a
game. From another point of view, they are the principles which must
be followed if what passes for success is to be achieved. And these
maxims are not merely empty phrases, for in the novel the politicians
who flaunt them fail. An oversimplified summary of their content would
be: follow party discipline regardless of any other considerations; use
any means likely to be effective to gain an advantage over an opponent;
follow political courses which are expedient rather than exemplary. One
of the most succinct statements of this attitude is made by Senator
Ratcliffe in Adams’s _Democracy_:
If Washington were President now, he would have to learn our ways
or lose his next election. Only fools and theorists imagine that
our society can be handled with gloves or long poles.... If virtue
won’t answer our purposes, we must use vice, or our opponents will
put us out of office....
=Office Holders: Rules and Skills=
Trollope’s novels constitute an excellent primer for the politician.
Phineas Finn’s political eclipses are caused primarily by his
persistent habit of voting in accordance with his conscience rather
than the Liberal Party line. Edward Wilcher in _To Be a Pilgrim_
takes what he believes will be a vacation from politics after losing
his seat in a close election. When he is ready to return, he finds
that his party will not have him. His brother Tom reflects, “Perhaps
they were always doubtful of him. They may have felt that he wasn’t
single-minded enough. They didn’t like his writing, especially things
like essays and criticism. Just as the Tories never liked Balfour’s
writing philosophy.” When Phineas Finn’s friend the Duke of Omnium
becomes Prime Minister, he permits himself the same luxury of being
impolitic. The death of the Marquis of Mount Fidgett gives him a
chance to award the Order of the Garter, normally given as a party
spoil rather than a tribute to merit. When Omnium bestows it upon the
good, fuddled, philanthropist Lord Earlybird, he nearly deals the
deathstroke to his weakening coalition. Mr. Daubeny, on the other hand,
is a consummate artist at the game of politics. Needing a vote of
confidence to remain in office, he conjures up a seemingly foolproof
and completely hypocritical measure for the test. As the head of the
Tories, he introduces a bill for the disendowment of the Established
Church. He assumes that the Liberals will be forced to vote for it
as legislation they might themselves have proposed. But the Liberals
play the expedient game, too, with the result that the Tories support
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account