The Popes and Science: The History of the Papal Relations to Science During the Middle Ages and Down to Our Own TimeWalsh, James J. (James Joseph)
Religion
The Popes and Science: The History of the Papal Relations to Science During the Middle Ages and Down to Our Own Time
Walsh, James J. (James Joseph)
Popes; Religion and science -- History; Science -- History
"The fame of Columbus as an anatomical teacher was exceedingly great
and widespread. Students were attracted to the universities where he
professed, from all {116} quarters and in large numbers. He was an
ardent student of his favorite science and was imbued with the
genius and enthusiasm of an original investigator. He was not
satisfied with the critical examination of mere structure, but
extended his researches into the more subtle, difficult and
important investigation of the physiological function. He has been
most aptly styled the Claude Bernard of the sixteenth century. The
work of Columbus is a masterpiece of method and purity of style, as
well as on account of its richness in facts and observations. He
spent over forty years in these studies and researches. _He
dissected an extraordinary number of human bodies. It must have been
an age of remarkable tolerance for scientific investigation, for in
a single year he dissected no less than fourteen bodies._ He also
entered the crypts and catacombs of ancient churches, where the
bones of the dead had been preserved and had accumulated century
after century, and there, with unwearied care, he handled and
compared over a half million of human skulls."
This account was written by Dr. George Jackson Fisher in his
"Historical and Bibliographical Notes" for the _Annals of Anatomy and
Surgery_ (Brooklyn, 1878-1880). All the material that Dr. Fisher used
in his sketch is to be found in Roth's "Life of Vesalius," p. 256.
Now, Columbus was a contemporary of Vesalius, and worked with him at
Bologna. The years of their lives correspond almost exactly. When
Vesalius left Padua to become the royal physician to Charles V., it
was Columbus who succeeded him. Later he taught also at Pisa. Then,
strange as it may seem for those who have put any faith in Dr. White's
excursion into medical science, he was invited to become Professor of
{117} Anatomy at the Papal University at Rome, and it was while there
that he had as many as three hundred students present at his
demonstrations in anatomy and there that he did fourteen dissections
in one year. The pretense that there was any ecclesiastical objection
to dissection becomes absolutely farcical when one compares the life
of Vesalius sketched by President White with a motive, and the life of
his contemporary and successor, Columbus, by an unbiased physician,
whose only idea was to bring out the facts.
According to Prof. White's opinion, Vesalius dedicated his work to
Charles V. to shield himself as far as possible, and after this gave
up his anatomical studies in Italy to put himself under the protection
of Charles V.
Vesalius's successor, Columbus, did not have to do any such thing.
Instead, he went down to Rome, and under the protection of the Popes
continued to carry on his anatomical work there.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account