The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
times, and that the government might be sure of support for its bad as
well as its good measures when they appeared to be directed towards the
doing of rough justice on individuals whose presence was felt to be
a common danger. It could be assumed that the means adopted for this
purpose would not be too closely scrutinised.
Government was from necessity a fighting machine. But it was a machine
so ill adapted for fighting that its action, far from attaining to
mechanical precision and gravity, was coarse, spasmodic, questionable,
and was driven to atone for want of ease and regularity by displaying
an excess of often ill-directed energy. The means ready to the hand
of the administration were scanty. Without an army, without police,
without detectives, the order maintained in the country practically
depended upon the goodwill of the upper and middle classes. The police
of the kingdom consisted of watchmen in the cities and boroughs; in
the country, of parish constables. Both were notoriously inefficient.
The type of watchmen with which Londoners were familiar in the opening
years of the seventeenth century is sufficiently known from the
character of Dogberry. About the same time the parish constables were
distinguished for being “often absent from their houses, being for
the most part husbandmen, and so most of the day in the fields.”[456]
As late as 1796 the watchmen of London were recruited by the various
authorities from “such aged and often superannuated men living in
their respective districts as may offer their services,” and were
recognised to be feeble, half-starved, lacking the least hope of
reward or stimulus to activity.[457] Without an excessive strain on
the imagination it may be conjectured that in the intervening period
the police system did not rise to a high pitch of perfection. In the
capital the king’s guards and the city trained bands were available
forces, but in the provinces the only body on which reliance could
be placed for the execution of justice was formed by the sheriff’s
officers or in the last resort the cumbrous militia. Even the militia
could not be maintained under arms for more than twelve days in the
year, for although the force of any county might be kept on foot for
a longer period by the king’s special direction, the Lord Lieutenant
had no power to raise money with which to pay the men.[458] The only
practicable instrument of government for the defence of the state
was the judicial system of the country. As there was no method known
for the prevention of crime by an organised force of police, and no
deterrent exerted on would-be criminals by the existence of a standing
body of soldiery, the only possible weapon to be used against them was
to be found in the law courts. It followed that the judges and justices
of the peace not only fulfilled the judicial and magisterial functions
which are known to modern times, but constituted as well an active arm
of the administration.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account