The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
Such was the state of society and the procedure of the English courts
when Edward Coleman was brought to the bar of the Court of King’s Bench
on November 27, 1678 to be tried on the charge of high treason. The
trial was a test case. In point of importance it was chief among the
series of trials for treason which arose from the Plot, for all the
others which followed to some extent depended from this. If Coleman
had been acquitted, there could have been no more to come. His letters
formed, as they still form, the weightiest part of the evidence against
the Roman Catholic intriguers,[554] and had they not secured his
conviction, the Jesuits, Mr. Langhorn, Lord Stafford, and Archbishop
Plunket would have gone unconvicted also. By his condemnation the way
was opened by which they were sent to the scaffold, the innocent and
the guilty alike, without favour or discrimination.
In the words of Sir George Jeffreys, Recorder of London, the indictment
set forth “that the said Edward Coleman, endeavouring to subvert the
Protestant religion and to change and alter the same, and likewise to
stir up rebellion and sedition amongst the king’s liege people and
also to kill the king,” did hold certain correspondence with “M. la
Chaise, then servant and confessor to the French king.”[555] In point
of fact the indictment lays by far the greater stress on the former of
these counts. The murder of the king is mentioned, but not insisted
upon. The charges against Coleman are summed up in the accusation of
a plot “to bring and put our said sovereign lord the king to final
death and destruction, and to overthrow and change the government of
the kingdom of England, and to alter the sincere and true religion of
God in this kingdom as by law established; and wholly to subvert and
destroy the state of the whole kingdom, being in the universal parts
thereof well-established and ordained; and to levy war against our
said sovereign lord the king within his realm of England”; and the
letters in which he endeavoured to obtain aid and assistance for these
objects are mentioned in particular.[556] Sergeant Maynard and Sir
William Jones, Attorney-General, followed and opened the evidence for
the crown. They too touched on the charge of killing the king and the
evidence which Oates was prepared to give on the subject, but dwelt
most heavily on Coleman’s correspondence with Throckmorton, Cardinal
Howard, and Père de la Chaize. “The prisoner at the bar,” said Maynard,
“stands indicted for no less than an intention and endeavour to murder
the king; for an endeavour and attempt to change the government of
the nation, so well settled and instituted, ... and for an endeavour
to alter the Protestant religion and to introduce instead of it the
Romish superstition and popery.”[557] The matter could not be better
or more briefly stated. The substantial charge against Coleman lay,
not in the actual attempt of which he was accused to murder the king,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account