The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
Coleman was not the first man to suffer for the Popish Plot. On
November 26, the day Coleman was brought to trial, William Staley, a
Roman Catholic goldsmith, had undergone a traitor’s death at Tyburn.
Staley was accused by two scoundrels of having in a public tavern
uttered words which announced his intention of taking away the king’s
life. The chief witness was a wretch named Carstairs, who had eked out
a precarious livelihood by acting as a government spy on conventicles
in Scotland.[605] Two others of the same kidney corroborated his
evidence. They swore that Staley had entered a cookshop in Covent
Garden to dine with a French friend named Fromante, and had there
burst into a rage against the king; the old man, Fromante, his friend,
said “that the king of England was a tormentor of the people of God,
and he answered again in a great fury, ‘He is a great heretic and the
greatest rogue in the world; here is the heart and here is the hand
that will kill him.’... In French the words were spoken, he making a
demonstration stamping with his foot: ‘I would kill him myself.’”[606]
By an act passed early in Charles II’s reign, “malicious and advised
speaking” had been made an overt act of high treason, and on this
Staley was indicted. Over his sentence historians have gone into
ecstasies of horror, on the ground that it is impossible to believe
that “a great Roman Catholic banker” in the position of Staley should
have spoken such words.[607] Staley however was not the banker, but the
banker’s son, and was not therefore of the same highly responsible age
and position as has been supposed. “Young Staley,” as he is called in
a letter of the time,[608] is identified by Von Schwerin, ambassador
of the Great Elector to the court of Charles II. On November 19 he
writes: “Auch ist der Sohn eines sehr reichen Goldschmieds gefänglich
eingezogen worden, weil er bei einem Gelage—wiewohl in trunkenem
Zustande—Reden geführt hat: die Conspiration sei noch nicht ganz
entdeckt, so habe er noch Hände den König zu ermorden.”[609] But the
decisive evidence on the point is the fact that William Staley’s
father, the banker, was alive some three weeks after he should,
according to the received account, have been hanged and quartered. On
December 18 his clerk and cashier were examined before the committee
of the House of Lords on the subject of a reported connection between
their master and Sir George Wakeman. The cashier had been in his
service for seven years. The next day Mr. Staley, as ordered, himself
attended the committee, bringing with him “the books wherein he has
kept his accounts the last two years.”[610] Obviously this man had been
head of the firm for more than the previous month, and the account
given by the Brandenburg envoy is correct.[611]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account