The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
A fortnight after Coleman’s execution, Whitebread, Fenwick, Ireland,
Pickering, and Grove were brought to the bar of the Old Bailey. Thomas
White or Whitebread, alias Harcourt, was a man sixty years of age.
He had been educated at St. Omers, became a professed father in the
Society of Jesus in 1652, and was chosen provincial of the English
province at the beginning of the year 1678.[615] It was by his means
that Oates had entered the Jesuit College at St. Omers after expulsion
from Valladolid, and it was he who Oates swore had boxed his ears on
learning that the plot was betrayed.[616] Fenwick, less well known by
his real name Caldwell, was ten years his junior. He had joined the
English mission from Flanders in 1675, and was now the London agent
for the college at St. Omers. Both were noted in the society for their
success in the missionary field.[617] Ireland, alias Ironmonger, had
come into England in 1677 as procurator of the province.[618] All
five were accused by Oates of being principals in the plot and privy
to the king’s death. Pickering, a Benedictine, and Grove, a Jesuit
lay-brother, were named as the actual agents in one of the schemes
for his assassination. Oates’ evidence was long and highly coloured.
He had been sent over by the Jesuits to murder Doctor Tonge. He had
seen instructions for the murder of the Bishop of Hereford and Dr.
Stillingfleet. He had been in the thick of a scheme of Fenwick’s
contrivance to raise rebellion in Scotland and Ireland. Whitebread
had sealed commissions for the popish army under the seal of Johannes
Paulus de Oliva, general of his order. Fenwick had been present when
Coleman paid the famous guinea to quicken the message which was to be
fatal to the king. All the prisoners had been present at the consult
on April 24, 1678, when a resolution to kill the king was signed by
at least forty persons, Pickering was to have thirty thousand masses
and Grove £1500 for the deed. They had dogged the king in St. James’
Park, and had twisted the silver bullets of their carbines that the
wound made might be incurable. Charles would infallibly have been shot
had not the flint of Pickering’s pistol been loose, and Pickering had
undergone penance of thirty lashes for his carelessness. To use their
own words, “they did intend to dispose of the duke too, in case he did
not appear vigorous in promoting the Catholic religion.”[619] To all
this there was little to be said. The prisoners put some questions to
Oates, and were in turn slightly questioned by the court. All that
appeared was that Grove had known Oates more intimately than he wished
to represent, and that the witness had borrowed from both Grove and
Fenwick money which had naturally never been repaid.[620] Fenwick
however offered to bring a document from St. Omers, under the seal of
the college and attested by unimpeachable witnesses, that Oates had
been at the seminary at the time when he swore that he was present
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account