The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
The secretaries of state and the privy council were already
overwhelmed with work which the investigation of the plot had thrown
upon their shoulders. For ten days the committees laboured at the
inquiry, and examined some dozens of witnesses without drawing nearer
to the desired end. Nothing appeared to throw light upon the subject.
Every clue which was taken up vanished in a haze of rumour and
uncertainty. There seemed every probability that the murderers would
escape detection. But information was soon to be forthcoming to shed a
ray of light upon the scene.
CHAPTER II
BEDLOE AND ATKINS
On October 20 a proclamation was published offering a pardon and
the reward of £500 to any one whose evidence should lead to the
apprehension and conviction of the murderers. Four days later a second
proclamation was issued containing in addition to these a promise of
protection to the discoverer of the culprits. It is easy to point out
that this course offered temptations to perjury and to sneer at the
motives of the government, but it must be remembered that in the days
when the police were a force of the future it was only by obtaining
an accomplice in the crime to give evidence that criminals could in
many cases be brought to justice. The proclamations took effect. At
five o’clock in the afternoon of Friday, November 1, Samuel Atkins
was arrested at the offices of the Admiralty in Derby House for being
concerned in the murder of Sir Edmund Godfrey. Atkins was clerk to
Samuel Pepys, the secretary of the navy board. He was arrested on the
evidence of a certain Captain Charles Atkins. The two men were not
related by blood, but were acquaintances, and “for name-sake have been
called cousins.” Captain Atkins had laid information before Henry
Coventry on October 27.[183] Three days later he made the same relation
to the privy council, and on Friday, November 1, swore to his statement
before Sir Philip Howard, justice of the peace for the county of
Middlesex. He deposed: “That in Derby-house, being in discourse with
Samuel Atkins (clerk of Mr. Pepys, secretary of the Admiralty), the
said Samuel did say that Sir Edmundbury Godfrey had very much vilified
his master, and that if he lived long would be the ruin of him; upon
which the said Samuel did ask this examinant whether he did think Child
to be a man of courage and secrecy; to which this examinant did reply
that the said Child had been at sea, and had behaved himself very well,
as he had been informed; upon which the said Samuel bid this examinant
send the said Child to his master, Mr. Pepys, but not to him the said
Samuel, for that he would not be seen to know anything of it. This
examinant did endeavour to find out the said Child, but did not meet
with him till the day after the discourse had happened between him
and Samuel Atkins, at the Three Tobacco Pipes in Holborn, where this
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account