The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
That this was Shaftesbury’s real object can hardly be doubted. Captain
Atkins was known to be a person of disreputable character, and gave
his evidence in the most suspicious manner.[189] When the man Child
was produced he did not know Samuel Atkins by sight, and was unable
to say anything about the matter.[190] The captain was treated by the
committee with consideration. Although some show was made of pressing
him in examination on his statements, the pressure was removed as soon
as it appeared that his embarrassment was likely to lead to awkward
consequences to his patrons.[191] He was sent to interview his namesake
in Newgate in the hope of extorting admissions in the course of
conversation, and seemed to have been posted with fresh charges against
Pepys and the Duke. He was evidently prepared to spice and expand his
evidence in this direction whenever it seemed desirable.[192] But
before the time arrived for this, a new witness appeared upon the scene.
On Wednesday, October 30, a man named William Bedloe wrote from
Bristol to Henry Coventry, secretary of state, signifying that he
had information to give concerning the murder of Sir Edmund Godfrey,
and desiring aid and protection in coming to London. The next day he
wrote in a similar strain to Secretary Sir Joseph Williamson. Both
the secretaries answered him. To make sure that he should not think
better of his project and escape, Williamson wrote to the mayor of
Bristol enclosing a communication for Bedloe, while Coventry addressed
his reply to Bedloe and enclosed a letter to the mayor with orders
to give whatever assistance might be necessary.[193] Bedloe gave
himself up forthwith to the mayor and was sent post-haste to town. On
November 7 he made a deposition before the council and was examined in
the presence of the king; on the 8th he was examined by the Lords’
committee and made a statement at the bar of the House.[194] It has
constantly been said that at his first examination Bedloe denied all
knowledge of the Popish Plot, and after professing to speak only to
Godfrey’s murder, the next day expanded his information to embrace more
general topics; and it is told that the king on hearing this exclaimed,
“Surely this man has received a new lesson during the last twenty-four
hours.[195]” The story is a mere fiction. In his first deposition he
“acquainted the Lords that he had several things to communicate to them
which related to the plot, and that he was able to confirm several
passages which Mr. Oates had discovered concerning the plot.”[196]
Examined on this, he gave a long account of the military operations to
be taken by the Roman Catholics; Chepstow Castle was to be surrendered
to Lord Powis, who was to command an army of twenty thousand “religious
men” shipped from Spain; a similar number were to sail from Flanders
to join Lord Bellasis at Bridlington Bay. He had known this for four
years, and had been employed by the Jesuits in London to carry letters
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account