The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
Meanwhile the public mind was occupied on other points. The trials
of Staley, Coleman, and Ireland for high treason filled the greater
part of one excited month.[217] Almost till Christmas the great murder
case made no progress. Just then, when it must have seemed less than
likely after the lapse of eight weeks and after the only hopeful trail
had disappeared that any substantial advance should be gained, an
extraordinary incident occurred. There was living in Covent Garden
a Roman Catholic silversmith, by name Miles Prance, who did a fair
business with those of his own religion and was occasionally employed
by the queen. He was a friend of the Jesuits who had been imprisoned
on account of the plot and, being in liquor one day at a tavern,
had declared loudly “that they were very honest men.” Suspicion was
aroused, and on inquiry it was found that he had slept away from his
house for three nights about the time of Godfrey’s disappearance. In
point of fact this had been before the date of the murder, and Prance’s
subsequent connection with the case was due to this initial mistake.
His landlord laid information, and on Saturday, December 21, Prance
was arrested for being concerned in Godfrey’s murder. He was taken
into the lobby of the House of Commons and was there waiting until
the committee was ready to examine him, when Bedloe happened to pass
through. His eye fell upon Prance and he cried out without hesitation,
“This is one of the rogues that I saw with a dark lantern about the
body of Sir Edmond Bury Godfrey, but he was then in a periwig.”[218]
Prance was taken before the committee of the House of Lords and
strictly examined. He denied knowing Walsh, Pritchard, or Le Fevre.
He denied that he was guilty of Sir Edmund Godfrey’s death and that
he had assisted in removing his body. When he spoke of Fenwick and
Ireland in the coffee-house he was drunk. He had not worn a periwig
once in the last ten years, but he owned one at home which had been
made twelve months since from his wife’s hair. He had not been to the
queen’s chapel at Somerset House once a month. After denying that he
had received money from Grove, he confessed that Grove had paid him for
some work. He first denied, but afterwards admitted that he had hired
a horse to ride out of town. He had intended to leave London to escape
the oaths administered to Roman Catholics, but had in the meantime been
arrested.[219] Prance was committed a close prisoner to Newgate, and
was lodged in the cell known as the condemned hole. There he remained
during the nights of December 21 and 22. On the morning of Monday,
December 23, he sent a message to the committee of inquiry offering on
the assurance of pardon to confess. By order of the House of Lords the
Duke of Buckingham and other noblemen were sent to Newgate with the
promise of pardon and to take his examination.[220] At the same time
the Commons ordered that the committee of secrecy or any three of them
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account