The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles IIPollock, John
History
The Popish Plot: A study in the history of the reign of Charles II
Pollock, John
Popish Plot, 1678
He had listened at
the door and heard Godfrey’s name mentioned, and one of the party had
threatened to kick him downstairs.[236] Several important witnesses
were called for the defence. Mary Tilden, the niece of Dr. Gauden,
and his housekeeper, Mrs. Broadstreet, gave evidence that Hill was at
home on the evening of the murder and the following nights, when he
was accused of being busy with the body, and that the corpse was never
brought to their lodgings. The judges continually bullied and sneered
at the witnesses. The room in which Prance said the body was laid was
described by Sir Robert Southwell as “an extraordinary little place.”
Mrs. Broadstreet said that it was impossible for a corpse to be placed
there without their knowledge. On this Mr. Justice Wild told her that
it was very suspicious, and Dolben remarked, “It is well you are not
indicted.” The hostile attitude of the court was not mollified when
it appeared that there was some confusion in the evidence of both
witnesses. Mary Tilden stated that during the time when they were in
town she had never been out of the lodgings after eight o’clock in the
evening. “When were you out of town?” asked Mr. Justice Jones. “In
October,” the witness answered. The judge pointed out that October was
just the month in question. Mistress Tilden said that she had made a
mistake; she had meant to say that they were out of town in September.
She said too that there was only one key to the door of the lodgings;
but Prance declared, and was not contradicted, that in her examination
before the Duke of Monmouth, Mrs. Broadstreet had admitted that there
were several. The latter made the mistake of saying that Hill occupied
the rooms until a fortnight after Michaelmas, whereas she had before
sworn, as Sir Robert Southwell testified, that he left them in the
first week in October.[237] The workman who had been employed at
Hill’s new house in Stanhope Street proved that he had been in Hill’s
company from nine to two in the afternoon of Saturday, October 12, and
a neighbour that Hill had been at his house from five to seven o’clock
on the same evening.[238] Green called for his defence his maid, his
landlord, and the landlord’s wife. The maid testified that Green was
always at home before nine o’clock at night; James Warrier and his wife
that he was within doors in their company till after ten o’clock on the
night of October 12. Mrs. Warrier however made the mistake of saying
that this was a fortnight after Michaelmas day, which it was not, and
so raised a doubt that the evidence was directed to a time a week later
than the date in question.[239] The most weighty evidence for the
defence was produced by Berry in the persons of the sentries who had
kept guard at the gate of Somerset House on the night of Wednesday,
October 16. On that night Prance swore that Berry had opened the gate
to let the sedan chair containing Godfrey’s corpse pass out. From seven
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account