The Popular Science Monthly, August, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
Science
The Popular Science Monthly, August, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
What the work gives is, in the first place, the magnitude and
approximate position of every star photographed. The determining of
the magnitude of a star is an important and delicate question. There
is no difficulty in determining, from the diameter of the image of the
star as seen in the microscope, what its photographic magnitude was
at the time of the exposure, as compared with other stars on the same
plate. But can we rely upon similar photographic magnitudes on a plate
corresponding to similar brightnesses of the stars? In the opinion of
Gill and Kapetyn we cannot. The transparency of the air varies from
night to night, and on a very clear night the same star will give a
stronger image than it will when the air is thick. Besides, slightly
different instruments were used in the course of the work. For these
reasons a scale of magnitude was determined on each plate by comparing
the photographic intensity of the images of a number of stars with the
magnitudes as observed with the eye by various observers. Thus on each
plate the magnitude was reduced to a visual scale.
It does not follow from this that the magnitudes are visual, and not
photographic. It is still true that a blue star will give a much
stronger photographic image than a red star of equal visual brightness.
In a general way, it may be said that the catalogue includes all the
stars to very nearly the tenth magnitude, and on most of the plates
stars of 10.5 were included. In fact, now and then is found a star of
the eleventh magnitude.
A feature of the work which adds greatly to its value is a careful
and exhaustive comparison of its results with previous catalogues of
the stars. When a star is found in any other catalogue the latter is
indicated. Most interesting is a complete list of catalogued stars
which ought to be on the photographic negatives, but were not found
there. Every such case was inexhaustibly investigated. Sometimes the
star was variable, sometimes it was so red in color that it failed
to impress itself on the plate, sometimes there were errors in the
catalogue.
The great enterprise of making a photographic map of the heavens
now being carried on as an international enterprise, having its
headquarters at Paris, is yet wider in its scope than the works we
have just described. One point of difference is that it is intended to
include all the stars, however faint, that admit of being photographed
with the instruments in use. The latter are constructed on a uniform
plan, the aperture of each being 34 centimetres, or 13.4 inches, and
the focal length 343 cm. Two sets of plates are taken, one to include
all the stars that the instrument will photograph near poles, and the
other only to take in those to the eleventh magnitude. Of the latter
it is intended to prepare a catalogue. Some portions of the German and
English catalogues have already been published, and their results will
be made use of in the course of the present work.
NUMBERING THE STARS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account