The Popular Science Monthly, August, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
Science
The Popular Science Monthly, August, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
Closely connected with the work of cataloguing the stars is that of
enumerating them. In view of what may possibly be associated with
any one star--planets with intellectual beings inhabiting them--the
question how many stars there are in the heavens is one of perennial
interest. But beyond the general statement we have already made, this
question does not admit of even an approximate answer. The question
which we should be able to answer is this: How many stars are there
of each easily visible magnitude? How many of the first magnitude, of
the second, of the third, and so on to the smallest that have been
measured? Even in this form we cannot answer the question in a way
which is at the same time precise and satisfactory. One magnitude
merges into another by insensible gradations, so that no two observers
will agree as to where the line should be drawn between them. The
difficulty is enhanced by the modern system--very necessary, it is
true--of regarding magnitude as a continuously varying quantity and
estimating it with all possible precision. In adjusting the new system
to the old one, it may be assumed that an average star of any given
magnitude on the old system would be designated by the corresponding
number on the new system. For example, an average star of the fourth
magnitude would be called 4.0; one of the fifth, 5.0, etc. Then the
brightest stars, which formerly were called of the fourth magnitude,
would now be, if the estimate were carried to hundredths, 3.50, while
the faintest would be 4.50. What were formerly called stars of the
fifth magnitude would range from 4.50 to 5.50, and so on. But we have
meet with a difficulty when we come to the sixth magnitude. On the
modern system, magnitude 6.0 represents the faintest star visible to
the naked eye; but the stars formerly included in this class would,
on the average, be somewhat brighter than this, because none could be
catalogued except those so visible.
The most complete enumeration of the lucid stars by magnitudes has been
made by Pickering (‘Annals of the Harvard Observatory,’ Vol. XIV). The
stars were classified by half magnitudes, calling
M. M.
Mag. 2.0 all from 1.75 to 2.25
2.5 all from 2.25 to 2.75
etc., etc.
For the northern stars Pickering used the Harvard Photometry; for the
southern, Gould’s ‘Uranometria Argentina.’ A zone from the equator to
30° south declination is common to both; for this zone I use Gould.
The number of each class in the entire sky, north and south of the
celestial equator, is as follows:
Northern Southern
Hemisphere. Hemisphere.
Pickering. Gould. Total.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account