The Popular Science Monthly, August, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
Science
The Popular Science Monthly, August, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
The Lamarckian view--that through disuse the organ is diminished
during the life of the individual, in part, at least, on account of
the diminution of the amount of blood going to a resting organ, and
that this effect is transmitted to succeeding generations--not only
would theoretically account for unlimited progressive degeneration,
but is the only view so far examined that does not on the face of it
present serious objections. Is this theory applicable in detail to the
conditions found in the Amblyopsidæ? Before going further, objections
may again be raised against the universal assumption that the cessation
of use and the consequent panmixia was a sudden process. This assumes
that the caves were peopled by a catastrophe. But it is absolutely
certain that the caves were not so peopled, that the cessation of use
was gradual, and the cessation of selection must also have been a
gradual process. There must have been ever-widening bounds within which
the variation of the eye would not subject the possessor to elimination.
Chologaster is in a stage of panmixia as far as the eye is concerned.
It is true the eye is still functional, but that the fish can do
without its use is evident by its general habit and by the fact that
it sometimes lives in caves. The present conditions have apparently
existed for countless generations--as long as the present habits have
existed--and yet the eye still maintains a higher degree of structure
than reverse selection, if operative, would lead us to expect, and
a lower than the birth mean of fishes depending on their eyes, the
condition that the state of panmixia alone would lead us to expect.
There is a staying quality about the eye with the degeneration, and
this can only be explained by the degree of use to which the eye is
subjected.
The results in Chologaster are due to panmixia and the limited degree
of use to which the eye is put. Chologaster Agassizii shows the rapid
diminution with total disuse.
The difference in the conditions between Chologaster and Amblyopsis,
Typhlichthys and Troglichthys, is that in the former the eyes are still
in use, except when living in caves; in the latter they have not been
in a position to be used for hundreds of generations. The transition
between conditions of possible use and absolute disuse may have been
rapid with each individual after permanently entering a cave. Panmixia,
as regards the minute eye, continued. Reversed selection, for economy,
can not have affected the eye for reasons already stated. The mere
loss of the force of heredity, unless this was caused by disuse, or
the process of germinal selection, can not have brought about the
conditions, because some parts have been affected more than others.
[Illustration: FIG. 7.--Head of a very young _Amblyopsis_ before all
the yolk is absorbed.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account