The Popular Science Monthly, August, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
Science
The Popular Science Monthly, August, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
To conclude, this volume is a most valuable contribution to the
scientific literature of the Arctic regions. It has but one marked
objection, its publication in such beautiful form and high price as
necessarily places this series beyond the means of many scientific
students.
DISCUSSION AND CORRESPONDENCE.
_LEGISLATION AGAINST MEDICAL DISCOVERY._[P]
[P] An open letter from President Eliot of Harvard University
to the Chairman of the Senate Committee on the District of
Columbia.
DEAR SIR: I observe that a new bill on the subject of vivisection has
been introduced into the Senate, Bill No. 34. This bill is a slight
improvement on its predecessor, but it is still very objectionable. I
beg leave to state very briefly the objection to all such legislation.
1. To interfere with or retard the progress of medical discovery is an
inhuman thing. Within fifteen years medical research has made rapid
progress, almost exclusively through the use of the lower animals,
and what such research has done for the diagnosis and treatment of
diphtheria it can probably do in time for tuberculosis, erysipelis,
cerebro-spinal meningitis and cancer, to name only four horrible
scourges of mankind which are known to be of germ origin.
2. The human race makes use of animals without the smallest
compunctions as articles of food and as laborers. It kills them,
confines them, gelds them and interferes in all manner of ways with
their natural lives. The liberty we take with the animal creation in
using utterly insignificant numbers of them for scientific researches
is infinitesimal compared with the other liberties we take with
animals, and it is that use of animals from which the human race has
most to hope.
3. The few medical investigators can not, probably, be supervised or
inspected or controlled by any of the ordinary processes of Government
supervision. Neither can they properly be licensed, because there is no
competent supervising or licensing body. The Government may properly
license a plumber, because it can provide the proper examination
boards for plumbers; it can properly license young men to practice
medicine, because it can provide the proper examination boards for that
profession, and these boards can testify to the fitness of candidates;
but the Government cannot provide any board of officials competent to
testify to the fitness of the medical investigator.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account