The Popular Science Monthly, August, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
Science
The Popular Science Monthly, August, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
We are able to publish in the present issue of the MONTHLY the address
given by Mr. G. K. Gilbert as retiring president of the American
Association for the Advancement of Science. The problem that he
discusses is one of the most pressing for scientific workers, while at
the same time it is of interest to everyone, and the address is at once
an important contribution to the subject and an exposition that all can
understand. The mathematical physicists find that as an abode fitted
for life the earth can not be allowed a history indefinitely long--not
longer perhaps than 20,000,000 years--while the geologists with equally
strong arguments claim a much greater antiquity. The biologists
are also concerned, owing to the time taken up by the processes of
evolution, and their facts and interests range them with the geologists
rather than with the physicists. The man not versed in science would
also prefer to assign a long history to the earth, for while he may
be ready to let the ‘dead past bury its dead,’ he looks forward even
to the distant future, and the shorter the past history of the earth
the less the time it will continue to be habitable. We have thus a
question in the solution of which all the sciences are concerned, and
one possessing a dramatic interest that appeals to everyone. The unity
of science is well illustrated by such a problem. It was the subject of
the address of the retiring president of the Association, a geologist;
it might be taken as the subject for the address of the newly elected
president, a biologist and student of the processes of evolution;
and it is one to which the president of the meeting, a mathematical
physicist, has given special attention.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account