The Popular Science Monthly, July, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
Science
The Popular Science Monthly, July, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
Derivations are given, but the history of the terms has not been
attempted. According to the author, ‘anlage’ may be variously rendered
as _rudiment_, _inception_ or _primordium_. ‘Chlorophyll’ receives the
double consonant at the end of the last syllable against the popular
extra-botanical practice. Regarding ‘medullary’ the author says: “I
have given the accent as it is always spoken (medul’-lary) though all
of the dictionaries (_botanical?_) accent it as med’-ullary except
Henslow’s.” In this the author had in mind the practice among his
insular colleagues only, since the latter pronunciation is given in
the Standard, Century and Webster’s Dictionaries and is followed by
nine tenths of the American botanists. “Mycorhizome = mycorrhiza-like
structures in Corallorhiza and Epipogum roots,” and “Mycorrhiza =
symbiotic fungi on the roots of plants, prothallia, etc.,” are not only
incongruous with orthography and botanical fact, but also with the
usage of all recent writers on this subject.
While many other errors of this character could be adduced, the general
value of the book is scarcely lessened, and it will be of the greatest
service to the working botanist, not only in raising the general
literary tone of his writings, but also in placing at his command a
choice of all of the established terms dealing with any phase of the
subject; an aid which will be greatly conducive to increased accuracy
of statement.
A decade since, the majority of the botanists engaged in the study
of the distribution of plants on this continent, as well as the
strict systematists, were quite unanimously of the opinion that the
territory within the boundaries of the United States had been quite
thoroughly explored, and that the task of the collector are well-nigh
done. Despite this discouraging conclusion a few enthusiastic workers
have not intermitted their labors in a more critical consideration of
the floras of the newer and less thickly settled regions, with the
result that scores and hundreds of new species have been brought to
light each year, and the awakening interest in the subject promises a
re-exploration of the great West.
A striking example of the results awaiting the student in this line is
afforded by Dr. Rydberg’s ‘Flora of Montana and the Yellowstone Park’
(New York Botanical Garden), which has recently appeared. Although
the first collections of plants in this region were made by the Lewis
and Clarke expedition nearly a century ago, Dr. Ryberg finds 163 new
species and varieties in the 1,976 which he lists in this volume.
Of this number 487 are found on both the eastern and western slopes
of the continental divide, 268 on the eastern side only, 520 on the
western side only, 42 of which are arctic and inhabit the high mountain
summits, and 659 which have originated in the exact region under
discussion. Seven hundred and seventy-six of the species listed were
not included in Coulter’s ‘Rocky Mountain Botany,’ published a few
years ago.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account