The Popular Science Monthly, June, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900Various
Science
The Popular Science Monthly, June, 1900: Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900
Various
Science -- Periodicals; Technology -- Periodicals
but, of course, not less than that of the ‘population as a whole.’
And, to continue with the main argument, if we wish to investigate the
longevity of shoemakers we should again have to decide upon some age
at which on the average a person has probably already acquired the
dexterity requisite to be a shoemaker. Even if we fix this so low as
ten years, at which time the expectation of life is forty-eight years,
it would bring the average age at death of shoemakers to fifty-eight
years. It has thus become extremely obvious that if we compared these
ages at death with the average life-period it would be just as easy
to prove that lawyers and shoemakers and merchants enjoy exceptional
longevity, as to prove that great men do. The average longevity is
low because of the very large infant mortality, which enters into the
composition of this average. When once the first ten years of life are
passed the further expectation of life increases quite slowly. Roughly
speaking, for every ten years between ten and fifty years the added
expectation of life is but three years for each decade. We therefore
see that in the very nature of things no one class of adults can
possibly live as much as thirty years longer than ‘the population as a
whole.’ The differences with which we are dealing are differences of a
finer order, of a small number of years, and being slight differences,
must be substantiated by a relatively large number of cases; the
cases, moreover, must be collected in a wholly unobjectionable manner;
that is, in a manner in which the principle of selection bears no
influence upon the longevity. To my knowledge adequate statistics which
exhibit the relative longevity of different classes do not exist, and
they certainly do not exist with regard to great men. We may therefore
conclude that the facts which have thus far been collected are not
opposed to the conclusion that great men enjoy favorable longevity, but
they certainly have not established or contributed to the establishment
of this fact. While it is not impossible to collect material which
may serve as corroborative evidence of the longevity of great men, it
seems probable that we must be content with evidence of a far inferior
character.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account