The post office and its story : $b an interesting account of the activities of a great government departmentBennett, Edward
History
The post office and its story : $b an interesting account of the activities of a great government department
Bennett, Edward
Postal service -- Great Britain -- History
We have seen in a previous chapter that just at the time when
the mail coach service had been magnificently organised, and vast sums
of money had been spent on improving the roads, the steam engine upset
all the calculations of the postal officials. Something of the same kind
seemed to be likely to happen in the case of the telephone and
telegraph. It is easy to be wise after the event, but the telegraph was
still a new toy in the hands of the postal officials, and their
strongest efforts were being directed to improve this branch of the
service.
But if the Post Office was not over enthusiastic in its welcome of the
new medium it was at any rate keen in the assertion of its own rights.
When the Edison Company announced its intention to start telephone
business in London the Postmaster-General at once instituted proceedings
against the company for infringement of his monopoly rights under the
Telegraph Act of 1869. This was a test action, and Mr. Justice Stephen,
who was the judge, decided that the telephone was in the meaning of the
Act a telegraph, and that telephone exchange business could not legally
be carried out except by the Postmaster-General or with his consent. The
decision covered also future inventions in regard to “every organised
system of communication by means of wires according to any preconcerted
system of signals.” This, it has been said, was the psychological moment
when the Government might then and there have taken advantage of its
position and have incorporated the telephone with the telegraph system.
But Great Britain acts cautiously in these matters, and as I have said
she has an intense respect for private enterprise. It is only when
competition between rival companies obviously fails to meet the wants of
the public that she consents to allow her Government to step in and do
the work itself. It was characteristic of our nation that divided
counsels should so long have been allowed to continue over the telephone
business; it was characteristic of our officials also, that they were
not prepared to launch out into any fresh expenditure of public money
with the purchase of the telegraphs still weighing heavily on their
consciences.
Public opinion would not have allowed the Post Office to act the dog in
the manger over the business, even if it desired to do so, and it
proceeded to grant licences to the telephone companies to work within
certain areas. In 1883 the Post Office did in fact propose to engage in
active competition with the companies, but the Treasury opposed the
policy on the ground that the State should at most be ready to
supplement and not to supersede private enterprise.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account