The Power of the Popes: An Historical Essay on Their Temporal Dominion, and the Abuse of Their Spiritual AuthorityDaunou, P. C. F. (Pierre Claude François)
History
The Power of the Popes: An Historical Essay on Their Temporal Dominion, and the Abuse of Their Spiritual Authority
Daunou, P. C. F. (Pierre Claude François)
Papacy -- History; Popes -- Temporal power
Paul was addressed by the doge to the prelates and clergy; and the
senate wrote on the same head to all the cities and communes of the
state. These two pieces are distinguished for their calm energy, which
mingles no insult, no indication of passion, with the expression of
unshaken resolution. We have omitted nothing, say the senators, to open
the eyes of his holiness; but he has closed his ear to our
remonstrances, as well as to the lessons of Scripture, of the holy
fathers and of councils; he perseveres in not acknowleging the secular
authority which God has committed to us, the independence of our
republic, and the rights of our fellow-citizens. Shall we appeal to a
general council? our ancestors have done it in similar circumstances;
but here the injustice is so palpable that a solemn appeal would be
superfluous. Our cause is too immediately that of our subjects, of our
allies, of our enemies themselves, that such an excommunication should
disturb for a moment the external or internal peace of our republic.
In fact, the anathema remained inefficacious within and without.³¹³ In
vain did the pope employ the Jesuits to raise or indispose the European
courts against the Venetians. In Spain even, where these Jesuitical
intrigues were somewhat more successful than elsewhere, the Venetian
ambassador was admitted to all the ecclesiastical ceremonies, in spite
of the threats of the nuncio. The governor of Milan, the dukes of Mantua
and Modena, the grand duke of Tuscany, the viceroy of Naples, openly
espoused the interests of the excommunicated republic. Sigismund, king
of Poland, also declared that it was the cause of his kingdom; and the
duke of Savoy, that it was that of every sovereign in Christendom. The
court of Vienna blamed the pope’s conduct, and invited Sorance, the
Venetian ambassador, to a procession of the holy sacrament, in despite
of the apostolic nuncio, who refused to be present at it. The nuncio
Barberini did not succeed better in France when he required that
entrance into the churches should be prohibited the Venetian ambassador.
Priuli. Abandoned thus at all the courts, and reduced to his own
spiritual and temporal resources, the sovereign pontiff resolved to levy
troops against Venice: happily for this papal army, Henry IV. offered
his mediation, and ended the dispute,³¹⁴ on terms more favourable than
Paul could have hoped for, although he had formed a ‘board of war:’ it
was in truth a committee of priests, and a perfectly novel application
of sacerdotal functions.
³¹³ The court of Rome, says Dumarsais, fears only those who do not
fear her, and concedes only to those who will not concede to her;
she has no power but that derived from the weakness of those who
are ignorant of their own rights, and who ascribe to her, what she
would never have dared to attribute to herself but for their blind
deference.—Exp. of the Doctrine of the Gallican Church, v. 228 of
7th vol. of Dumariais’ Works.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account