The Power of the Popes: An Historical Essay on Their Temporal Dominion, and the Abuse of Their Spiritual AuthorityDaunou, P. C. F. (Pierre Claude François)
History
The Power of the Popes: An Historical Essay on Their Temporal Dominion, and the Abuse of Their Spiritual Authority
Daunou, P. C. F. (Pierre Claude François)
Papacy -- History; Popes -- Temporal power
At the same time that the bishops wrote this epistle, Frederick prepared
to pass into Italy.!²⁰⁰ Adrian called to mind William of Sicily and
perceived that it was time to shew some deference to the emperor.
Legates more skilful and more complying, came to Augsburgh, and
presented Frederick with another epistle from Adrian²⁰¹ The pope
explained in it the terms of his first letter, and the explanation
amounted to a retraction. “By the word ‘beneffcium,’ he says, we
understand not a benefice or a fief, but a benefit or a service. In
speaking of your crown, we do not pretend having conferred it on you; we
refer only to the honour we have had of placing it on your august head;
‘contulimus’ that is to say, imposuimus.” This commentary, which by no
means pleases Baronius,²⁰² satisfied the emperor, and produced between
this prince and the pope a reconciliation which was not of long
duration.
In the month of October 1150,²⁰³ Frederick held at Roncaille, between
Parma and Placentia, an assembly, in which the bishops and abbots
acknowledged that they held from him their royal privileges.
Dissatisfied with this declaration, and with the asperity with which the
officers of the emperor asserted the right of forage over the lands of
the Roman Church, Adrian wrote an epistle to Frederick which has not
been preserved; but Radevic, who gives us a relation of it,²⁰⁴ says,
that it concealed, under humble and gentle terms, much bitterness and
hauteur. In replying to it, Frederick affected to place, in the
inscription, his own name before that of the sovereign pontiff.²⁰⁵ It
was to revert to an ancient custom, to which were substituted for some
time past forms supposed to be more respectful. This bagatelle nettled
the holy, father; and history relates, that letters were intercepted
which he wrote to the Milanese, and other subjects of Frederick, to
invite them to revolt. We do not possess those letters; but the reply of
Adrian to the emperor has been transmitted to us.²⁰⁶
“To place your name before ours, says the servant “of the
servants of Christ, is arrogance, is insolence; “and to cause
bishops to render homage to you, “those whom the Scriptures call
Gods, sons of the “Most High, is to want that faith which you
“have sworn to St. Peter, and to us. Hasten then “to amend, lest
that in taking to yourself that which “does not belong to you,
you lose the crown with “which we have gratified you.”
This epistle²⁰⁷ did not remain unreplied to; the minds of both became
inflamed, and in despite of the négociations attempted in an assembly at
Bologna in 1159, war was going to break out, had not the pope died the
first of September of the same year, at the very moment, says an
historian²⁰⁸ at which he pronounced the excommunication of Frederick.
¹⁹⁸ Concilior, vol. 10, p. 1145.
¹⁹⁹ Radev. Gest. Frider. 1.1, c. 16.
²⁰⁰ Radev. 1. 17, c. 23.
²⁰¹ Concilior. vol. 10, p. 1147.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account