The Powers of Europe and Fall of SebastopolA British officer
History
The Powers of Europe and Fall of Sebastopol
A British officer
Crimean War, 1853-1856; Europe -- History -- 1789-1900
Persians as to make Bagdad, Mesopotamia, and Georgia subject to him.
Under this monarch the Ottoman empire reached its climax of renown
and power. Before his death, symptoms of decline began to manifest
themselves. Though extending his authority over an immense tract
of country, he had failed to develop the internal strength, and
consolidate the internal union, of his kingdom. The conquered nations
were not properly incorporated, so as to constitute an integral part
of Turkey. Hence, the frequency of the revolts, which, with varying
success, for a long time after the death of Soliman, alike disturbed
the peace and exhausted the strength of the Byzantine government.
Ever since 1566, the Ottoman sovereigns have, in most instances,
ascended the throne from a prison, and then surrendered themselves to
the effeminate luxuries of the seraglio, until their despicable reign
terminated either by assassination, or by deposition and another
imprisonment. Several grand viziers, or prime ministers, have at
different periods supplied their masters’ deficiencies and screened
their vices. Through the zeal and talents of these active servants
of the State, it has been retarded in its declension and preserved
from utter disintegration. The people continued for many years to
sink deeper and deeper into ignorance, poverty, and helplessness,
whilst in the provinces rapacious Pashas exceeded the cupidity and
emulated the voluptuousness of the Sultan in the capital. The Sublime
Porte, as the Ottoman government is often called, became an object of
contempt and ridicule to all European nations. It remained inactive
and unprogressive, whilst each of these was rapidly striving on
towards the goal of intelligence and freedom, which still waits to be
fully attained. Blindly attached to their fatalistic doctrines, and
elated by their past military glory, the Turks looked upon foreigners
with proud scorn, and despised them as dogs and infidels. Without any
settled place, but incited by hatred of the Christians and a thirst
for conquest, they carried on wars with Persia, Venice, Hungary,
and Poland. The mutinies of the janissaries and the rebellions of
subordinate governors often became dangerous in the extreme: but the
ruling despot contrived from time to time to exterminate the enemies
he feared, by the dagger or the bowstring; and the ablest men were
not unfrequently sacrificed to the hatred of the soldiery or of the
sacred college. The successor to the throne commonly put all his
brothers to death, whilst the people regarded with apathy either the
murder of a cruel Sultan whom they hated, or of a weak one, whom they
could not fear.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account