The Practical Astronomer: Comprising illustrations of light and colours--practical descriptions of all kinds of telescopes--the use of the equatorial-transit--circular, and other astronomical instruments, a particular account of the Earl of Rosse's large telescopes, and other topics connected with astronomyDick, Thomas
Science
The Practical Astronomer: Comprising illustrations of light and colours--practical descriptions of all kinds of telescopes--the use of the equatorial-transit--circular, and other astronomical instruments, a particular account of the Earl of Rosse's large telescopes, and other topics connected with astronomy
Dick, Thomas
Astronomical instruments; Astronomy; Telescopes
This telescope constitutes the most important and useful improvement
ever made upon telescopic instruments; and, it is probable, it will,
ere long, supersede the use of all other telescopes. Its importance and
utility will at once appear when we consider, that a good achromatic
telescope of only 4 or 5 feet in length will bear a magnifying power
as great, as that of a common astronomical telescope 100 feet long,
and even with a greater degree of distinctness, so that they are now
come into general use both for terrestrial and celestial observations.
There are, indeed, certain obstructions which prevent their being made
of a very large size; but from the improvement in the manufacture
of achromatic glass which is now going forward, it is to be hoped
that the difficulties which have hitherto impeded the progress of
opticians will soon be removed. In order to understand the nature
of this telescope, it will be necessary to advert a little to the
_imperfections_ connected with common refracting telescopes.
[Illustration: _figure 52._]
The first imperfection to which I allude is this, that _spherical
surfaces do not refract the rays of light accurately to a point_;
and hence the image formed by a single convex lens is not perfectly
accurate and distinct. The rays which pass near the extremities of such
a lens meet in foci nearer to the lens than those which pass nearly
through the centre, which may be illustrated by the following figure.
Let PP (fig. 52) be a convex lens and E_e_ an object, the point E of
which corresponds with the axis, and sends forth the rays EM, EN, EA,
&c., all of which reach the surface of the glass, but in different
parts. It is manifest that the ray EA which passes through the middle
of the glass, suffers no refraction. The rays EM, EM, likewise, which
pass through near to EA, will be converged to a focus at F, which we
generally consider as the focus of the lens. But the rays EN, EN, which
are nearer to the edge of the glass will be differently refracted, and
will meet about G, nearer to the lens, where they will form another
image G_g_. Hence, it is evident, that the first image F_f_, is formed
only by the union of those rays which pass very near the centre of the
lens; but as the rays of light proceeding from every point of an object
are very numerous, there is a succession of images formed, according
to the parts of the lens where they penetrate, which necessarily
produces indistinctness and confusion. This is the imperfection which
is distinguished by the name of _spherical aberration_, or the error
arising from the spherical form of lenses.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account