The Practical Astronomer: Comprising illustrations of light and colours--practical descriptions of all kinds of telescopes--the use of the equatorial-transit--circular, and other astronomical instruments, a particular account of the Earl of Rosse's large telescopes, and other topics connected with astronomyDick, Thomas
Science
The Practical Astronomer: Comprising illustrations of light and colours--practical descriptions of all kinds of telescopes--the use of the equatorial-transit--circular, and other astronomical instruments, a particular account of the Earl of Rosse's large telescopes, and other topics connected with astronomy
Dick, Thomas
Astronomical instruments; Astronomy; Telescopes
The _dispersion_ of light is estimated by the variable angle formed by
the red and violet rays which bound the solar spectrum;--or rather,
it is the excess of the refraction of the most refrangible ray above
that of the least refrangible ray. The dispersion is not proportional
to the refraction--that is, the substances which have an equal mean
refraction, do not _disperse_ light in the same ratio. For example,
if we make a prism with plates of glass, and fill it with oil of
Cassia, and adjust its refracting angle ACB, (fig. 31, p. 127,) so
that the middle of the spectrum which it forms falls exactly at the
same place where the green rays of a spectrum formed by a glass prism
would fall--then we shall find that the spectrum formed by the _oil
of Cassia_ prism will be two or three times _longer_ than that of the
_glass_ prism. The oil of Cassia, therefore, is said to _disperse_ the
rays of light more than the glass, that is, to separate the extreme
red and violet rays at O and P more than the mean ray at _green_, and
to have a greater _dispersive power_. Sir I. Newton appears to have
made use of prisms composed of different substances, yet, strange to
tell, he never observed that they formed spectrums, whose lengths were
different, when the refraction of the green ray was the same; but
thought that the dispersion was proportional to the refraction. This
error continued to be overlooked by philosophers for a considerable
time, and was the cause of retarding the invention of the achromatic
telescope for more than 50 years.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account