The Practical Astronomer: Comprising illustrations of light and colours--practical descriptions of all kinds of telescopes--the use of the equatorial-transit--circular, and other astronomical instruments, a particular account of the Earl of Rosse's large telescopes, and other topics connected with astronomyDick, Thomas
Science
The Practical Astronomer: Comprising illustrations of light and colours--practical descriptions of all kinds of telescopes--the use of the equatorial-transit--circular, and other astronomical instruments, a particular account of the Earl of Rosse's large telescopes, and other topics connected with astronomy
Dick, Thomas
Astronomical instruments; Astronomy; Telescopes
14 | 0. 403 || 506 | 18. 82 | 0. 260 | 784
18 | 12. 67 | 0. 409 || 528 | 19. 63 | 0. 264 | 818
19 | 13. 20 | 0. 414 || 550 | 20. 45 | 0. 268 | 852
20 | 13. 71 | 0. 420 || 571 | 21. 24 | 0. 271 | 885
One great advantage of reflecting telescopes above common refractors,
is, that they will admit of eye glasses of a much shorter focal
distance, and consequently, will magnify so much the more, for the
rays are not coloured by reflection from a concave mirror, if it be
ground to a true figure, as they are by passing through a convex
glass though figured and polished with the utmost exactness. It will
be perceived from the above table, that the focal length of the eye
glasses is very small, the lowest there stated being only about 1/10
of an inch, and the highest little more than 1/4 of an inch focal
distance. Sir W. Herschel obtained the high powers which he sometimes
put upon his telescopes, by using small double convex lenses for eye
glasses, some of which did not exceed the _one fiftieth of an inch_ in
focal length. When the focal length of the concave speculum, and that
of the eye glass are given, the magnifying power is found by dividing
the former by the latter, after having reduced the focal length of the
concave speculum to inches. Thus the 6 feet speculum, multiplied by 12,
produces 72 inches, which, divided by Brewster’s number for the focus
of the eye glass = 200, or 1/5 of an inch, produces a quotient of 360
as the magnifying power. It has been calculated that, if the metals
of a Newtonian telescope be worked as exquisitely as those in Sir W.
Herschel’s 7 feet reflector, the highest power that such a telescope
should bear with perfect distinctness, will be found by multiplying the
diameter of the great speculum in inches, by 74, and the focal distance
of the single eye glass may be found by dividing the focal distance of
the great mirror by the magnifying power. Thus 6.25--the aperture in
inches of Herschel’s 7 feet Newtonian--multiplied by 74 is 462-1/2, the
magnifying power; and 7 multiplied by 12, and divided by 462.5 is 0.182
of an inch, the focal distance of the single eye glass required. But
it is seldom that more than one half of this power can be applied with
effect to any of the planetary bodies. For general purposes the power
produced by multiplying the diameter of the speculum by 30, or 40, will
be found most satisfactory.
The following are the general prices of reflecting telescopes as made
by the London opticians.
£ _s._
A four feet, seven inch aperture, Gregorian Reflector; with
the vertical motions upon a new invented principle, as well as
apparatus to render the tube more steady in observation;
according to the additional apparatus of small speculums,
eye-pieces, micrometers, &c. from 80 to 120 0
Three feet long, mounted on a plain brass stand 23 2
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account