The Practical Astronomer: Comprising illustrations of light and colours--practical descriptions of all kinds of telescopes--the use of the equatorial-transit--circular, and other astronomical instruments, a particular account of the Earl of Rosse's large telescopes, and other topics connected with astronomyDick, Thomas
Science
The Practical Astronomer: Comprising illustrations of light and colours--practical descriptions of all kinds of telescopes--the use of the equatorial-transit--circular, and other astronomical instruments, a particular account of the Earl of Rosse's large telescopes, and other topics connected with astronomy
Dick, Thomas
Astronomical instruments; Astronomy; Telescopes
_Aberration of lenses._--In connection with the above descriptions,
the following statements respecting the spherical aberration of lenses
may not be inappropriate. Mr. John Dollond, in a letter to Mr. Short,
remarks, that ‘the aberration in a single lens is as the cube of the
refracted angle; but if the refraction be caused by two lenses, the sum
of the cubes of each half will be 1/4 of the refracted angle, twice
the cube of 1 being 1/4 the cube of 2. So three times the cube of 1 is
only _one ninth_ of the cube of 3.’ &c. Hence the indistinctness of the
borders of the field of view of a telescope is diminished by increasing
the number of lenses in an eye piece. Sir J. Herschel has shown that if
two plano-convex lenses are put together as in fig. 75, the aberration
will be only 0.2481, or _one fourth_ of that of a single lens in its
best form. The focal length of the first of these lenses, must be to
that of the second as 1 to 2.3. If their focal lengths are equal, the
aberration will be 0.603, or nearly one half. The spherical aberration,
however, may be _entirely_ destroyed by combining a meniscus and double
convex lens, as shown in fig. 76, the convex sides being turned to the
eye when they are used as lenses, and to parallel rays, when they are
used as burning glasses. Sir J. Herschel has computed the following
curvatures for such lenses.
_Focal length of the convex lens_ +10.000
Radius of its first surface +5.833
Radius of its second surface -35.000
_Focal length of the meniscus_ +17.829
Radius of its first surface +3.688
Radius of its second surface +6.294
Focal length of the compound lens +6.407
On the general principles above stated, a good astronomical eye-piece
may be easily constructed with two proper lenses, either according to
the plan of Huygens or that of Ramsden; and, from what has been now
stated it is demonstrably certain, that, in all cases where two glasses
are properly combined, such an eye-piece is superior to a single lens,
both in point of distinctness, and of the enlargement of the field of
view. I lately fitted up an eye-piece, on Ramsden’s principle, with
two lenses, each about 3 inches focal length, and 1-3/8 inch diameter,
placed at half an inch distant, with their convex surfaces facing
each other as in fig. 74, which forms an excellent eye-piece for an
achromatic telescope, 6 feet 8 inches focal distance, and 4 inches
aperture, particularly for viewing clusters of stars, the Milky Way,
and the large nebulæ. The field of view is large, the magnifying power
is only between 50 and 60 times, and the quantity of light being so
great, every celestial object appears with great brilliancy, and it is
in general much preferable, when applied to the stars than any of the
higher powers. When applied to _Presepe_ in Cancer, it exhibits that
group at one view, as consisting of nearly a 100 stars which exhibit a
beautiful and most striking appearance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account