The Practical Astronomer: Comprising illustrations of light and colours--practical descriptions of all kinds of telescopes--the use of the equatorial-transit--circular, and other astronomical instruments, a particular account of the Earl of Rosse's large telescopes, and other topics connected with astronomyDick, Thomas
Science
The Practical Astronomer: Comprising illustrations of light and colours--practical descriptions of all kinds of telescopes--the use of the equatorial-transit--circular, and other astronomical instruments, a particular account of the Earl of Rosse's large telescopes, and other topics connected with astronomy
Dick, Thomas
Astronomical instruments; Astronomy; Telescopes
Sir David Brewster, in his ‘Treatise on New Philosophical instruments,’
Book i. chap. vii. page 59, published in 1813, has adverted to this
circumstance, in his description of an ‘Eye-piece wire micrometer,’ and
complains of Mr. Ezekiel Walker, having in the ‘Philosophical Magazine’
for August, 1811, described such an instrument as an invention of his
own. Dr. Kitchener some years afterwards, described what he called a
Pancratic or omnipotent eye-piece, and got one made by Dollond, with a
few modifications different from that suggested by Brewster and Walker,
which were little else than cutting the single tube into several parts,
and giving it the _appearance_ of a new invention. In fact, none of
these gentlemen had a right to claim it as his peculiar invention, as
the principle was known and recognised long before. I had increased the
magnifying powers of telescopes, on the same principle, several years
before any of these gentlemen communicated their views on the subject,
although I never formally constructed a scale of powers. Mr. B. Martin,
who died in 1782, proposed many years before, such a moveable interior
tube as that alluded to, for varying the magnifying power.
In order to give the reader a more specific idea of this contrivance,
I shall present him with a figure and description of one of Dr.
Kitchener’s Pancratic eye-pieces, copied from one lately in my
possession. The following are the exact dimensions of this instrument,
with the focal distances, &c. of the glasses, &c. of which it is
composed.
[Illustration: _fig. 81._]
In. Tenths.
Length of the whole eye-piece, consisting of
four tubes, when fully drawn out, or the distance
from A to B. fig. 81. 14 4
Length of the three tubes on which the
scale is engraved, from the commencement of
the divisions at B to their termination at C. 9 15
Each division into tens is equal to 3-10ths of an inch.
When the three inner tubes are shut up to
C, the length of the eye-piece is exactly 5 5
When these tubes are thus shut up, the magnifying
power for a 3-1/2 feet achromatic is 100
times, which is the smallest power. When the
inner tube is drawn out 1/3 of an inch, or to
the first division, the power is 110, &c.
Focal distance of the lens next the object 1 0
Breadth of Ditto. 0 65
The plane side of this glass is next the object.
Focal distance of the second glass from the
object 1 5
This glass is double and equally convex,
Breadth 0 5
Distance between these two glasses 1 7
Focal distance of the third or field lens,
which is plane on the side next the eye 1 1
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account