The Practical Astronomer: Comprising illustrations of light and colours--practical descriptions of all kinds of telescopes--the use of the equatorial-transit--circular, and other astronomical instruments, a particular account of the Earl of Rosse's large telescopes, and other topics connected with astronomyDick, Thomas
Science
The Practical Astronomer: Comprising illustrations of light and colours--practical descriptions of all kinds of telescopes--the use of the equatorial-transit--circular, and other astronomical instruments, a particular account of the Earl of Rosse's large telescopes, and other topics connected with astronomy
Dick, Thomas
Astronomical instruments; Astronomy; Telescopes
When light impinges, or falls, upon a polished flat surface,
rather more than the half of it is reflected, or thrown back in a
direction similar to that of its approach; that is to say, if it fall
_perpendicularly_ on the polished surface, it will be perpendicularly
reflected; but if it fall _obliquely_, it will be reflected with
the same obliquity. Hence, the following fundamental law, regarding
the reflection of light, has been deduced both from experiment and
mathematical demonstration, namely, that _the angle of reflection is,
in all cases, exactly equal to the angle of incidence_. This is a law
which is universal in all cases of reflection, whether it be from
plane or spherical surfaces, or whether these surfaces be concave or
convex, and which requires to be recognized in the construction of all
instruments which depend on the reflection of the rays of light. The
following figure (fig. 14) will illustrate the position now stated.
Let AB represent a plane mirror, and CD a line or ray of light
perpendicular to it. Let FD represent the _incident_ ray from any
object, then DE will be the reflected ray, thrown back in the
direction from D to E, and it will make with the perpendicular CD the
same angle which the incident ray FD did with the same perpendicular,
that is, the angle FDC will be equal to the angle EDC, in all cases of
obliquity. The incident ray of light may be considered as rebounding
from the mirror, like a tennis ball from a marble pavement, or the wall
of a court.
[Illustration: _figure 14._]
In viewing objects by reflection we see them in a different direction
from that in which they really are, namely, along the line in which the
rays come to us last. Thus, if AB (fig. 15) represent a plane mirror,
the image of an object C appears to the eye at E behind the mirror, in
the direction EG, and always in the intersection G of the perpendicular
CG, and the reflected ray EG--and consequently at G as far behind
the mirror, as the object C is before it. We therefore see the image
in the line EG, the direction in which the reflected rays proceed. A
plane mirror does not alter the figure or size of objects; but the
whole image is equal and similar to the whole object, and has a like
situation with respect to one side of the plane, that the object has
with respect to the other.
[Illustration: _figure 15._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account