English literature; Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616 -- Appreciation
He was then interrogated concerning some other ambiguous passages
in his works; but he declined any satisfactory answer; saying, if
Mr. Theobald had not writ about it sufficiently, there were three or
four more new editions of his plays coming out, which he hoped would
satisfy every one: concluding, “I marvel nothing so much as that men
will gird themselves at discovering obscure beauties in an author.
Certes the greatest and most pregnant beauties are ever the plainest
and most evidently striking; and when two meanings of a passage can in
the least balance our judgments which to prefer, I hold it matter of
unquestionable certainty that neither of them is worth a farthing.”
From his works our conversation turned on his monument; upon which
Shakespeare, shaking his sides, and addressing himself to Milton, cried
out, “On my word, brother Milton, they have brought a noble set of
poets together; they would have been hanged erst have convened such a
company at their tables when alive.” “True, brother,” answered Milton,
“unless we had been as incapable of eating then as we are now.”
“A Journey from this World to the Next,”
Chapter viii. _Miscellanies_, 1743.
THOMAS EDWARDS, 1747
(1699-1757)
CANON I. A Professed Critic has a right to declare that his Author
wrote whatever He thinks he ought to have written, with as much
positiveness as if he had been at his elbow.
CANON II. He has a right to alter any passage which He does not
understand.
CANON III. These alterations He may make in spite of the exactness of
measure.
CANON IV. Where He does not like an expression, and yet cannot mend it,
He may abuse his Author for it.
CANON V. Or He may condemn it as a foolish interpolation.
CANON VI. As every Author is to be corrected into all possible
perfection, the Professed Critic is the sole judge; He may alter any
word or phrase, which does not want amendment, or which _will do_,
provided He can think of anything which He imagines _will do better_.
CANON VII. He may find out obsolete words, or coin new ones, and put
them in the place of such as He does not like, or does not understand.
CANON VIII. He may prove a reading or support an explanation by any
sort of reasons, no matter whether good or bad.
CANON IX. He may interpret his Author so as to make him mean directly
contrary to what he says.
CANON X. He should not allow any poetical licences, which He does not
understand.
CANON XI. He may make foolish amendments or explanations, and refute
them, only to enhance the value of his critical skill.
CANON XII. He may find out a bawdy or immoral meaning in his Author
where there does not appear to be any hint that way.
CANON XIII. He need not attend to the low accuracy of orthography, or
pointing; but may ridicule such trivial criticisms in others.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account