The Prehistoric World; Or, Vanished RacesAllen, Emory Adams
History
The Prehistoric World; Or, Vanished Races
Allen, Emory Adams
Archaeology; Indians; Prehistoric peoples
As we have spent some time in learning the different objects
manufactured out of bronze, it may be of interest to learn
somewhat of their methods of working bronze. We have already
stated how the amateur worker in bronze would follow on after the
trader—and so the objects of bronze would be made in all the
countries of Europe. Molds have been found in various places.
This is a mold for casting the axes having a socket in which to
put the handle. It was found in the cave at Heathbury Burn,
already mentioned. None of the bronze objects were forged out, as
a smith forges out objects of iron—they were cast. In the absence
of steel, it would be almost impossible to cut bronze; hence it
was necessary to make the casting as nearly perfect as possible.
Sometimes the molds were cut out of stone, as in the figure just
given. The molds themselves were, in this case, difficult to
make; besides, they could scarcely be made so perfect as not to
leave a little ridge, where the two halves of the mold came
together, which, as just explained, owing to the absence of
steel, it would be very difficult to remove. In process of time
they discovered an easier way of making the molds, that employed
at the present day—that is, by the use of sand. The ridge would
still remain, and is to be plainly seen on specimens of ancient
bronze.
To overcome the difficulty just mentioned, they invented a third
method of casting, which displays great ingenuity. A model of the
object desired was made of wood or wax, and inclosed in prepared
earth mixed with some inflammable material, in order that, when
subjected to heat, it might become porous. The whole was then
heated until the wax or wood disappeared. The mold was then ready
for use. The great advantage of this method was that there were
no projecting lines of junction to disfigure the complete
implement. This seems to have been the most common method
employed. This explains the fact, that we seldom find any two
bronze objects exactly similar to one another. Any impression
left on the wax model would be faithfully reproduced. Marks of
the spatula, with which the wax was worked, are frequently found;
and, in one case, the impression of the human finger was
observed.17
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account