The Prehistoric World; Or, Vanished RacesAllen, Emory Adams
History
The Prehistoric World; Or, Vanished Races
Allen, Emory Adams
Archaeology; Indians; Prehistoric peoples
Mr. Hosea thinks he has found satisfactory evidence that between
these walls there was a paved street, as he discovered in one
place, about two feet below the present surface, a pavement of
flat stones.73 From this, as a hint, he eloquently says:
“Imagination was not slow to conjure up the scene which was once
doubtless familiar to the dwellers at Fort Ancient. A train of
worshipers, led by priests clad in their sacred robes, and
bearing aloft the holy utensils, pass in the early morning, ere
yet the mists have risen in the valley below, along the gently
swelling ridge on which the ancient roadway lies. They near the
mound, and a solemn stillness succeeds their chanting songs; the
priests ascend the hill of sacrifice and prepare the sacred fire.
Now the first beams of the rising sun shoot up athwart the ruddy
sky, gilding the topmost boughs of the trees. The holy flame is
kindled, a curling wreath of smoke arises to greet the coming
god; the tremulous bush which was upon all nature breaks into
vocal joy, and songs of gladness bursts from the throats of the
waiting multitude as the glorious luminary arises in majesty and
beams upon his adoring people. A promise of renewed life and
happiness. Vain promise, since even his rays can not penetrate
the utter darkness which for ages has settled over this people.”
Thus imagination suggests, and enthusiasm paints a scene, but,
from positive knowledge, we can neither affirm nor deny its
truth.
Most of the works of the Mound Builders are noticeable for their
solidity and massiveness. We see this illustrated in the great
walls of Fort Ancient. Some of our scholars think this is a
distinguishing feature of the Mound Builders’ work.74 It seems to
us that it is difficult to make this a distinguishing feature, as
we have no means of knowing how much “massiveness” is required in
a work to entitle it to be considered a work of the Mound
Builders. Should this distinction be established, however, we
have to notice that while in the western part of the State of
Ohio the Mound Builders’ inclosures are more often of the
defensive sort, the type changes to the eastward, where, as in
the Scioto Valley, we find the so-called sacred inclosures in
larger numbers. In the State of Ohio, then, there were at least
two well defined types of works by the Mound Builders. But if we
split the Mound Builders up into tribes, where shall we draw the
line between them and our later Indians?
Fortified Headland, Northern Ohio.
Inclosures, Northern Ohio.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account