(3) Force: “Some Considerations on the Mound Builders,” p. 64; “Am. Antiquarian,” March, 1884, pp. 93-4; “10th Annual Report, Peabody Museum,” p. 11. (4) Short’s “North Americans of Antiquity”, p. 28. (5) Squier and Davis’s “Ancient Monuments,” p. 105. (6) Foster’s “Prehistoric Paces,” p. 148. (7) Squier’s “Aboriginal Monuments of New York,” Smithsonia Contribution No. 11, p. 83. (8) Squier’s “Aboriginal Monuments of New York,” Smithsonia Contribution No. 11, p. 87. (9) Foster’s “Prehistoric Races,” p. 121. (10) “They are numbered by millions.” Ibid. (11) Prof. Forshey could frame no satisfactory hypothesis of their origin. Ibid, p. 122. (12) “Native Races,” Vol. IV, pp. 739 and 740. (13) Smithsonian Rep., 1870, p. 406. (14) Narrative of U.S. exploring expedition during the years 1838-42, Vol. IV, p. 334. (15) Prof. Gibbs in Frank Leslie’s Monthly, August, 1883. (16) “Ancient Monuments,” p. 139. (17) Jones’s “Explorations in Tennessee,” p. 15. (18) “Ancient Monuments,” p. 143. Explorers for Bureau of Ethnology so report it in the South. Prof. Putnam, who has certainly had great experience, says he has always found the layers to be horizontal. (19) “Sixteenth Annual Report Peabody Museum,” p, 171. An ornament shaped to resemble the head of a wood-pecker, made of gold, derived from some Spanish source, was found in a mound in Florida. This particular mound must have been erected after the discovery of America. (“Smithsonian Report,” 1877, p. 298, _et seq._) (20) “Sixteenth and Seventeenth Report Peabody Museum.” These ornaments were made of hammered iron. This is the first time that native iron has been found in the mounds. (Putnam.) (21) “Prehistoric Races,” p. 178. (22) J. E. Stevens’s Paper, read before the Muscatine Academy of Science, Dec., 1878. (23) That this was at any rate sometimes the case See “Ancient Monuments,” p. 159. (24) “Peabody Museum Reports,” Vol. II, p. 58. (25) Jones’s “Explorations in Tennessee,” p. 15. See also “First An. Rep. Bureau of Ethnology,” p. 198. (26) “Ancient Monuments,” p. 169. See also note on same page for another account of a larger number of skeletons. (27) Short’s “North Americans of Antiquity,” App. A. (28) James’s “Popular Science,” File 1883, p. 445. (29) “Ancient Monuments,” p. 173. (30) “Ancient Monuments,” p. 74. (31) “Views of Louisiana.” (32) This cut represents the mound as it probably was before the outlines were destroyed by cultivation. It is based on a model prepared by Dr. Patrick for the Peabody Museum.