The Press-Gang Afloat and AshoreHutchinson, J. R. (John Robert)
History
The Press-Gang Afloat and Ashore
Hutchinson, J. R. (John Robert)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Impressment
In this estimate there is, however, a substantial error; for,
approaching the question from another point of view, let us suppose, as
we may safely do without overstraining the probabilities of the case,
that out of every three men pressed at least one ran from his rating.
Now the primary cost of pressing three men on the 20 Pound basis being
60 Pounds, it follows that in order to obtain their ultimate cost to the
country we must add to that sum the outlay incurred in pressing another
man in lieu of the one who ran. The total cost of the three men who
ultimately remain to the fleet consequently works out at 80 Pounds; the
cost of each at 26 Pounds, 13s. 4d. Hence Nelson's forty-two thousand
deserters entailed upon the nation an actual expenditure, not of
1,680,000 Pounds, but of nearly two and a quarter millions.
Another fact that emerges from a scrutiny of these remarkable figures is
this. Whenever the number of volunteer additions to the fleet increased,
the cost of pressing increased in like ratio; whenever the number of
volunteers declined, the pressed man became proportionally cheaper.
Periods in which the pressed man was scarce and dear thus synchronise
with periods when the volunteer was plentiful; but scarcity of
volunteers, reacting upon the gangs, and conducing to their greater
activity, brought in pressed men in greater numbers in proportion to
expenditure and so reduced the cost per head. In this logical though at
first sight bewildering interrelation of the laws of supply and demand,
we have in a nutshell the whole case for the cost of pressing as against
the gang. Taking one year with another the century through, the impress
service, on a moderate estimate, employed enough able-bodied men to man
a first-rate ship of the line, and absorbed at least enough money to
maintain her, while the average number of men raised, taking again one
year with another, rarely if ever exceeded the number of men engaged in
obtaining them. With tranquillity at length assured to the country, with
trade in a state of high prosperity, the shipping tonnage of the nation
rising by leaps and bounds and the fleet reduced to an inexigent peace
footing, why incur the ruinous expense of pressing the seaman when, as
was now the case, he could be had for the asking or the making?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account