Portugal -- History -- Joseph, 1750-1777 -- Fiction
To return to the revolt at Oporto. The Jesuits were accused of being
the instigators even of this transaction; but we, although no friends of
theirs, as may have been guessed, acquit them completely of having had
any share in the affair. By an unsuccessful rebellion they could have
gained nothing, and must have been aware that such would only strengthen
the power of the Minister. We feel assured, therefore, that they were
innocent of this charge; nor was it at all in accordance with their
usual mode of proceeding: they would have acted far more cautiously and
sensibly, so that nothing might be attempted without an almost certain
confidence of success. However, the old proverb, "Give a dog a bad
name," was fully exemplified in their case, and every disturbance in the
country was imputed to them. We think that, in many respects, they were
very hardly used; and we might as well suppose that the followers of the
new Bible (which a foreigner told us we English heretics had lately
published, called the Oxford Tracts,) were guilty of the riots in Wales,
as that they would have excited people to open rebellion. The past had,
and the present have, a very different aim in view: they seek not to
overthrow dynasties, but to establish their power on the weakness and
folly of their fellow-men; they wish to hide the gold, that their own
base alloy may be taken as genuine ore. While pretending to point out
the narrow path to heaven, they, like the cunning fowler, lead their
fascinated admirers into their own well-constructed decoys;--more narrow
and narrow grows the way, with many a twist and turn, till at length
they cast their nets, from whose meshes there is no escape.
Now, it is very far from our wish to speak disrespectfully of the Church
of Rome, or in any way to decry it. On the contrary, we cannot conceive
an establishment more admirably adapted for every purpose of
untrammelled government. It at once puts a stop to all doubts or
discussions, pointing out so exactly what people ought to believe, that
they have no further trouble on the subject. As when men have learnt to
submit in one way, they generally do so in another, were we a sovereign
desirous of absolute power, we should prefer it as the religion of the
state, and then, keeping its ministers our friends, we should, if we
pleased, be able to govern with the most despotic rule.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account