The Prince of the Captivity: The Epilogue to a RomanceGrier, Sydney C.
General
The Prince of the Captivity: The Epilogue to a Romance
Grier, Sydney C.
Kings and rulers -- Fiction; Political fiction
“Is there anything you think I ought to do?” asked Usk at last.
“Do? What can you do? You are absolutely debarred from enlightening
Félicia, as I understand, or even from informing any one else of the
circumstances. Obviously, then, the only thing that practically
concerns you is the marriage at St Mary Windicotes. That’s your
starting-point. I suppose you didn’t think of running down there to
look up the register before you went to America?”
“No; I had no opportunity.”
“Do it when you are next in town, and note especially whether there is
that slip of paper pasted on the inside of the cover, or not. It is
just possible that Steinherz _père_ made up the whole story on the
strength of his likeness to the Archduke, though I allow that would
not account for Félicia’s profile. That marriage once established,
you are safe in England and America, at any rate, for people know
better than to inquire too curiously into the pedigree of heiresses
from the States. Of course it would not hold for a moment in Pannonia.
There you would have to take your stand on the quasi-ceremony which
Steinherz devised to spite his chaplain. If he had lived, it would
almost certainly have been annulled on an appeal to Rome by his
family, but as he was otherwise disposed of, no doubt they thought the
less fuss made the better. As it is, you see, the sole evidence for it
is the word of a dead man, for the other witnesses would know better
than to testify to it unless the Emperor directed them to open their
lips.”
“But would it in any circumstance be valid?”
“It is the kind of marriage that may be either valid or invalid at the
will of the families concerned. If it was to the advantage of the
Albrets to consider it an ordinary morganatic marriage, they would
condone Steinherz’s defiance, and probably induce the Emperor to
confer a title of nobility on Félicia. Or if there was something
really important at stake--for instance, if you took it into your head
to revive your father’s claim to Thracia, and made yourself
troublesome in the Balkans, and they found they must buy you off--they
might even be brought to recognise the marriage as fully valid and
regular, and declare Félicia a Princess of Arragon, just as a bribe
to you to stay at home. It has been done, notably about two hundred
years ago, in a case intimately connected with English history, but
naturally, the consideration would have to be a large one. And on the
other hand, if they see no advantage to them in the matter, they can
deny the Pannonian marriage, and refuse to recognise the English one,
and continue to give out officially that Prince Joseph was drowned off
the Australian coast, however forcibly it may be proved to them that
he wasn’t.”
“I’m glad to hear you say this, for I still feel sometimes as if I was
keeping Félicia out of something that was her due.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account