London (England) -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction
As to this, Hyacinth wondered sufficiently himself, while the Princess
touched upon the people and places she had seen, the impressions and
conclusions she had gathered, since their former meeting. It was to
such matters as these that she directed the conversation; she appeared
to wish to keep it off his own concerns, and he was surprised at her
continued avoidance of the slums and the question of her intended
sacrifices. She mentioned none of her friends by name, but she talked
of their character, their houses, their manners, taking for granted, as
before, that Hyacinth would always follow. So far as he followed he was
edified, but he had to admit to himself that half the time he didn’t
know what she was talking about. At all events, if _he_ had been with
the dukes (she didn’t call her associates dukes, but Hyacinth was sure
they were of that order), he would have got more satisfaction from
them. She appeared, on the whole, to judge the English world severely;
to think poorly of its wit, and even worse of its morals. “You know
people oughtn’t to be both corrupt and dull,” she said; and Hyacinth
turned this over, feeling that he certainly had not yet caught the
point of view of a person for whom the aristocracy was a collection of
bores. He had sometimes taken great pleasure in hearing that it was
fabulously profligate, but he was rather disappointed in the bad
account the Princess gave of it. She remarked that she herself was very
corrupt—she ought to have mentioned that before—but she had never been
accused of being stupid. Perhaps he would discover it, but most of the
people she had had to do with thought her only too lively. The second
allusion that she made to their ulterior designs (Hyacinth’s and hers)
was when she said, “I determined to see it”—she was speaking still of
English society—“to learn for myself what it really is, before we blow
it up. I have been here now a year and a half, and, as I tell you, I
feel that I have seen. It is the old régime again, the rottenness and
extravagance, bristling with every iniquity and every abuse, over which
the French Revolution passed like a whirlwind; or perhaps even more a
reproduction of Roman society in its decadence, gouty, apoplectic,
depraved, gorged and clogged with wealth and spoils, selfishness and
scepticism, and waiting for the onset of the barbarians. You and I are
the barbarians, you know.” The Princess was pretty general, after all,
in her animadversions, and regaled him with no anecdotes (he rather
missed them) that would have betrayed the hospitality she had enjoyed.
She couldn’t treat him absolutely as if he had been an ambassador. By
way of defending the aristocracy he said to her that it couldn’t be
true they were all a bad lot (he used that expression because she had
let him know that she liked him to speak in the manner of the people),
inasmuch as he had an acquaintance among them—a noble lady—who was one
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account