London (England) -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction
Audley Court, he sometimes emitted a short satiric gleam which showed
that his esteem for the poor was small and that if he had no illusions
about the people who had got everything into their hands he had as few
about those who had egregiously failed to do so. He was tremendously
reasonable, which was largely why Hyacinth admired him, having a desire
to be so himself but finding it terribly difficult.
Muniment’s absence of passion, his fresh-coloured coolness, his easy,
exact knowledge, the way he kept himself clean (except for the chemical
stains on his hands) in circumstances of foul contact, constituted a
group of qualities that had always appeared to Hyacinth singularly
enviable. Most enviable of all was the force that enabled him to sink
personal sentiment where a great public good was to be attempted and
yet keep up the form of caring for that minor interest. It seemed to
Hyacinth that if _he_ had introduced a young fellow to Hoffendahl for
his purposes, and Hoffendahl had accepted him on such a recommendation,
and everything had been settled, he would have preferred never to look
at the young fellow again. That was his weakness, and Muniment carried
it off far otherwise. It must be added that he had never made an
allusion to their visit to Hoffendahl; so that Hyacinth also, out of
pride, held his tongue on the subject. If his friend didn’t wish to
express any sympathy for him he was not going to beg for it (especially
as he didn’t want it) by restless references. It had originally been a
surprise to him that Muniment should be willing to countenance a
possible assassination; but after all none of his ideas were narrow
(Hyacinth had a sense that they ripened all the while), and if a
pistol-shot would do any good he was not the man to raise pedantic
objections. It is true that, as regards his quiet acceptance of the
predicament in which Hyacinth might be placed by it, our young man had
given him the benefit of a certain amount of doubt; it had occurred to
him that perhaps Muniment had his own reasons for believing that the
summons from Hoffendahl would never really arrive, so that he might
only be treating himself to the entertainment of judging of a little
bookbinder’s nerve. But in this case, why did he take an interest in
the little bookbinder’s going to Paris? That was a thing he would not
have cared for if he had held that in fact there was nothing to fear.
He despised the sight of idleness, and in spite of the indulgence he
had more than once been good enough to express on the subject of
Hyacinth’s epicurean tendencies what he would have been most likely to
say at present was, ‘Go to Paris? Go to the dickens! Haven’t you been
out at grass long enough for one while, didn’t you lark enough in the
country there with the noble lady, and hadn’t you better take up your
tools again before you forget how to handle them?’ Rosy had said
something of that sort, in her free, familiar way (whatever her
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account