As we had already occasion to mention, Sommerfeld has, in two papers on
four dimensional geometry (_vide_, Annalen der Physik, Bd. 32, p. 749;
and Bd. 33, p. 649), translated the ideas of Minkowski into the language
of four dimensional geometry. Instead of Minkowski’s space-time vector
of the first kind, he uses the more expressive term ‘four-vector,’
thereby making it quite clear that it represents a directed quantity
like a straight line, a force or a momentum, and has got 4 components,
three in the direction of space-axes, and one in the direction of the
time-axis.
The representation of the plane (defined by two straight lines) is much
more difficult. In three dimensions, the plane can be represented by the
vector perpendicular to itself. But that artifice is not available in
four dimensions. For the perpendicular to a plane, we now have not a
single line, but an infinite number of lines constituting a plane. This
difficulty has been overcome by Minkowski in a very elegant manner which
will become clear later on. Meanwhile we offer the following extract
from the above mentioned work of Sommerfeld.
(Pp. 755, Bd. 32, Ann. d. Physik.)
“In order to have a better knowledge about the nature of the six-vector
(which is the same thing as Minkowski’s space-time vector of the _2nd_
kind) let us take the special case of a piece of plane, having unit area
(contents), and the form of a parallelogram, bounded by the four-vectors
_u_, _v_, passing through the origin. Then the projection of this piece
of plane on the _xy_ plane is given by the projections _u__{_x_},
_u__{_y_}, _v__{_x_}, _v__{_y_} of the four vectors in the combination
φ_{_x_ _y_} = _u__{_x_}_v__{_y_} - _u__{_y_}_v_{_x_}.
Let us form in a similar manner all the six components of this plane φ.
Then six components are not all independent but are connected by the
following relation
φ_{_y_ _z_} φ_{_x_ _l_} + φ_{_z_ _x_} φ_{_y_ _l_} + φ_{_x_ _y_}
φ_{_z_ _l_} = 0
Further the contents | φ | of the piece of a plane is to be defined as
the square root of the sum of the squares of these six quantities. In
fact,
| φ |² = φ_{_y_ _z_}² + φ_{_z_ _x_}² + φ_{_x_ _y_}² + φ_{_x_ _l_}² +
φ_{_y_ _l_}² + φ_{_z_ _l_}².
Let us now on the other hand take the case of the unit plane φ^* normal
to φ; we can call this plane the Complement of φ. Then we have the
following relations between the components of the two plane:—
φ_{_y_ _z_}^* = φ_{_x_ _l_}, φ_{_z_ _x_}^* = φ_{_y_ _l_}, φ_{_x_
_y_}^* = φ_{_z_ _l_} φ_{_z_ _l_}^* = φ_{_y_ _x_} ...
The proof of these assertions is as follows. Let _u_^*, _v_^* be the
four vectors defining φ^*. Then we have the following relations:—
_u__{_x_}^* _u__{_x_} + _u__{_y_}^* _u__{_y_} + _u__{_z_}^*
_u__{_z_} + _u__{_l_}^* _u__{_l_} = 0
_u__{_x_}^* _v__{_x_} + _u__{_y_}^* _v__{_y_} + _u__{_z_}^*
_v__{_z_} + _u__{_l_}^* _v__{_l_} = 0
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account