The Principles of Biology, Volume 2 (of 2)Spencer, Herbert
Science
The Principles of Biology, Volume 2 (of 2)
Spencer, Herbert
Biology
Where there is this small dependence of each part upon the whole,
there is but small dependence of the whole upon each part. The longer
time which it takes for the arrest of a function to produce death in
a less-differentiated animal than in a more-differentiated animal,
may be illustrated by the case of respiration. Suffocation in a man
speedily causes resistance to the passage of the blood through the
capillaries, followed by congestion and stoppage of the heart: great
disturbance throughout the system results in a few seconds, and in
a minute or two all the functions cease. But in a frog, with its
undeveloped respiratory organ, and a skin through which a considerable
aëration of the blood is carried on, breathing may be suspended for
a long time without injury. Doubtless this difference is proximately
due to the greater functional activity in the one case than in the
other, and the more pressing need for discharging the produced carbon
dioxide; but the greater functional activity being itself made possible
by the higher specialization of functions, this remains the primary
cause of the greater dependence of the other functions on respiration,
where the respiratory apparatus has become highly specialized. Here
indeed, we see the relation under another aspect. This more rapid
rhythm of the functions which increased heterogeneity of structure
makes possible, is itself a means of integrating the functions. Watch,
when it is running down, a complicated machine of which the parts are
not accurately adjusted, or are so worn as to be somewhat loose. There
will be observed certain irregularities of movement just before it
comes to rest--certain of the parts which stop first, are again made to
move a little by the continued movement of the rest, and then become
themselves, in turn, the causes of renewed motion in other parts which
have ceased to move. That is to say, while the connected rhythmical
changes of the machine are quick, their actions and reactions on one
another are regular--all the motions are well integrated; but as the
velocity diminishes irregularities arise--the motions become somewhat
disintegrated. Similarly with organic functions: increase of their
rapidity involves increase of a joint momentum which controls each
and co-ordinates all. Thus if we compare a snake with a mammal, we
see that its functions are not tied together so closely. The mammal,
and especially the superior mammal, requires food with considerable
regularity; keeps up a respiration which varies within but moderate
limits; and has periods of activity and rest that alternate evenly and
frequently. But the snake, taking food at long intervals, may have
these intervals greatly extended without fatal results; its dormant and
its active states recur less uniformly; and its rate of respiration
varies within much wider limits--now being scarcely perceptible and
now, as you may prove by exciting it, becoming conspicuous. So that
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account