The Principles of Leather ManufactureProcter, H. R. (Henry Richardson)
History
The Principles of Leather Manufacture
Procter, H. R. (Henry Richardson)
Leather
The bark is peeled with tools of various forms, the branch and knotted
places being loosened by beating with a mallet. The bark must be peeled
immediately the tree has been felled.
The peeled bark, in pieces up to three feet long, is laid on hurdles
sloped in such a way that the rain runs off as much as possible, and in
this way it is dried, but in wet seasons is much damaged. Bark so dried
in the woods often retains 40-50 per cent. water, and must be stacked or
stored so as to allow of further drying.
English bark is sometimes sold in “long rind,” and sometimes “hatched”
or chopped in pieces about four inches long. Belgian and Dutch barks are
generally hatched. Belgian tree bark is “cleaned” (and cleanings often
mixed back with bulk), Dutch bark is not cleaned. Much sand and dirt is
contained in most Continental bark: screenings of Belgian bark yielded a
black liquor, and contained so much sand that they would not even burn!
_Oak-bark extract_ is occasionally offered for sale, but is not usually
genuine or of good quality, except that of the American chestnut-oak,
_Q. prinus_, from which an excellent extract has been manufactured in
the Alleghanies. Factitious extracts often contain myrobalans and
quebracho.
[Illustration: FIG. 45.--Turkey Oak (_Quercus cerris_).]
_Oakwood_ contains only a very small percentage (from 2-4 per cent.) of
a tannin, practically identical with that of chestnut, but different to
that of oak-bark. It is stated by de Lof to reach 9-14 per cent. in old
heart-wood; but this is doubtful. The wood retains the tannin in its
interior for a long time. Wood of a Roman bridge built at Mainz 55 B.C.
is stated by de Lof to have still contained 2·14 per cent. tannin in
1881 A.D. A good deal of imitated oakwood extract is undoubtedly made
from chestnut wood, and unfortunately no very satisfactory way of
distinguishing it is known, though oak-bark extract can be distinguished
from oakwood by giving a precipitate at once, even in dilute solution,
with bromine-water, while the wood gives a brown precipitate only after
long standing. Precipitation by bromine-water is a general
characteristic of catechol tannins, and hence a mixture of quebracho (a
cheap catechol tan) with chestnut would simulate oak-bark in this
respect. If a few drops of the non-tannin solution or an alcoholic
extract from the “total soluble” of extracts containing quebracho or
other catechol tannins be treated with concentrated sulphuric acid in a
test-tube, a deep crimson will be produced, especially at the surface of
the acid, which remains pink on dilution with water. With pyrogallol
derivatives, such as genuine oakwood, a yellow or brown only is produced
(J. Hughes). The test is very delicate. Another distinction is that bark
extracts contain perceptible traces of manganese, but this cannot be
relied on as many wood extracts also contain some, probably derived from
the twig and branch bark which is used along with the wood. Oakwood
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account