The Principles of Leather ManufactureProcter, H. R. (Henry Richardson)
History
The Principles of Leather Manufacture
Procter, H. R. (Henry Richardson)
Leather
These mills, Fig. 68, consist of a “bell” or inner cone, covered with
blades or teeth arranged at a slight angle to the vertical section of
the cone, and which are made finer and increased in number towards its
lower and wider part. This cone rotates within an outer hollow cone or
casing, also provided with blades or teeth which are sloped slightly in
the opposite direction to those of the inner cone, so as to meet them at
an angle, like the cutting-blades of a pair of scissors, and the angles
of the cone are so chosen that the blades approach each other more
closely towards their base. The outer cone is fixed, and is provided
with a hopper like a coffee-mill, while the inner cone is so rotated on
its axis that bark placed in the hopper is screwed down between the two,
and cut finer and finer till it reaches the lower edge, when it drops
out. The blades or teeth are usually cast in one piece with the metal
cones, and sharpened when required by chipping with cold chisels. This
operation should not be conducted in the mill-house, or small chippings
of iron may get mixed with the bark, and cause stains on the leather.
This form of mill, which is run in England at about 30 revolutions per
minute, and at nearly three times this speed in America, works very well
with dry material, but clogs badly if it be appreciably damp. On this
account it is always well to run the mill with a fairly slack belt which
will slip before exerting sufficient pressure to break the machine, as
in such operations as grinding, safety clutches are of but little use.
A type of mill varying somewhat from the above, consists of a pair of
discs or very obtuse cones, the inner one of which runs on a horizontal
axis. The teeth are generally arranged in concentric rings and interlock
with each other. The material to be ground is fed at or near the centre
of the fixed disc, and escapes at the edges. The construction of this
class of mill will be easily understood from Fig. 69. Very small pieces
of iron or steel which get caught between the teeth will often result in
the breaking of the latter, and the formation of iron dust, which is a
serious objection to the employment of this type of mill (to which the
Schmeija “Excelsior,” the Glaeser “Favorita,” and the “Devil
Disintegrator” of the Hardy Patent Pick Co. belong) for grinding barks.
[Illustration: FIG. 69.--“Excelsior” Mill.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account