The Principles of Psychology, Volume 2 (of 2)James, William
Science
The Principles of Psychology, Volume 2 (of 2)
James, William
Psychology
_The part played by the peripheral sense-organ_ in hallucination is
just as obscure as we found it in the case of imagination. The things
seen often seem opaque and hide the background upon which they are
projected. It does not follow from this, however, that the retina
is actually involved in the vision. A contrary process going on in
the visual centres would prevent the retinal impression made by the
outer realities from being felt, and this would in mental terms be
equivalent to the hiding of them by the imaginary figure. The negative
after-images of mental pictures reported by Meyer and Féré, and the
negative after-images of hypnotic hallucinations reported by Binet and
others so far constitute the only evidence there is for the retina
being involved. But until these after-images are explained in some
other way we must admit the possibility of a centrifugal current from
the optical centres downwards into the peripheral organ of sight,
paradoxical as the course of such a current may appear.
'PERCEPTION-TIME.'
_The time which the perceptive process occupies_ has been inquired
into by various experimenters. Some call it perception-time, some
choice-time, some discrimination-time. The results have been already
given in Chapter XIII (vol. I, p. 523 ff.), to which the reader is
consequently referred.
Dr. Romanes gives an interesting variation of these time-measurements.
He found[138]
"an astonishing difference between different individuals with respect
to the rate at which they are able to _read_. Of course reading
implies enormously intricate processes of perception both of the
sensuous and of the intellectual order; but if we choose for these
observations persons who have been accustomed to read much, we may
consider that they are all very much on a par with respect to the
amount of practice which they have had, so that the differences in
their rates of reading may fairly be attributed to real differences in
their rates of forming complex perceptions in rapid succession, and
not to any merely accidental differences arising from greater or less
facility acquired by special practice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account