The principles of science : $b a treatise on logic and scientific methodJevons, William Stanley
Philosophy
The principles of science : $b a treatise on logic and scientific method
Jevons, William Stanley
Logic; Science -- Methodology
One combination, ABCD, may be converted into another A*b*C*d* by
interchanging one or more of the classes with the complementary
classes. The number of such changes is called the *distance*, which in
the above case is 2. In two similar compound statements the distances
of the combinations denied must be the same; but it does not follow
that when all the distances are the same, the statements are similar.
There is, however, only one example of two dissimilar statements having
the same distances. When the distance is 4, the two combinations
are said to be *obverse* to one another, and the statements denying
them are called *obverse statements*, as in ABCD = 0 and *abcd* = 0
or again A*b*C*d* = 0 and *a*B*c*D = 0. When any one combination is
given, called the *origin*, all the others may be grouped in respect
of their relations to it as follows:--Four are at distance *one* from
it, and may be called *proximates*; six are at distance *two*, and may
be called *mediates*; four are at distance *three*, and may be called
*ultimates*; finally the obverse is at distance *four*.
Origin and Six Obverse and
four proximates. mediates. four ultimates.
*ab*CD
|
*a*BCD A*bc*D | A*b*C*d* A*bcd*
| \ | / |
| \ | / |
| \|/ |
ABC*d*--ABCD--A*b*CD + *abc*D--*abcd*--*a*B*cd*
| /|\ |
| / | \ |
| / | \ |
AB*c*D *a*B*c*D | *a*BC*d* *ab*C*d*.
|
AB*cd*
It will be seen that the four proximates are respectively obverse to
the four ultimates, and that the mediates form three pairs of obverses.
Every proximate or ultimate is distant 1 and 3 respectively from such a
pair of mediates.
Aided by this system of nomenclature Professor Clifford proceeds to an
exhaustive enumeration of types, in which it is impossible to follow
him. The results are as follows:--
1-fold statements 1 type }
2 " " 4 types}
3 " " 6 " }
4 " " 19 " } 159
5 " " 27 " }
6 " " 47 " }
7 " " 55 " }
8-fold statements 78 "
Now as each seven-fold or less-than-seven-fold statement is
complementary to a nine-fold or more-than-nine-fold statement, it
follows that the complete number of types will be 159 × 2 + 78 = 396.
It appears then that the types of statement concerning four classes
are only about 26 times as numerous as those concerning three classes,
fifteen in number, although the number of possible combinations is 256
times as great.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account