The Private Life of the RomansJohnston, Harold Whetstone
History
The Private Life of the Romans
Johnston, Harold Whetstone
Rome -- Social life and customs
§214. Roofs.--The construction of the roofs (_tēcta_) differed very
little from the modern method, as may be seen in the illustration
shown in §196. They varied as much as ours do in shape, some being
flat, others sloping in two directions, others in four. In the most
ancient times the covering was a thatch of straw, as in the so-called
hut of Romulus (_casa Rōmulī_) on the Palatine Hill preserved even
under the Empire as a relic of the past (Fig. 61). Shingles followed
the straw, only to give place in turn to tiles. These were at first
flat, like our shingles, but were later made with a flange on each
side (Fig. 62) in such a way that the lower part of one would slip
into the upper part of the one below it on the roof. The tiles
(_tēgulae_) were laid side by side and the flanges covered by other
tiles, called _imbricēs_ (Fig. 63) inverted over them. Gutters also of
tile ran along the eaves to conduct the water into cisterns, if it was
needed for domestic purposes. The appearance of the completed roof is
shown in Fig. 49, §202.
[Illustration: FIGURE 64. DOOR OF ROMAN HOUSE]
§215. The Doors.--The Roman doorway, like our own, had four parts: the
threshold (_līmen_), the two jambs (_postēs_), and the lintel (_līmen
superum_). The lintel was always of a single piece of stone and
peculiarly massive. The doors were exactly like those of modern times,
except in the matter of hinges, for while the Romans had hinges like
ours they did not use them on their doors. The door-hinge was really a
cylinder of hard wood, a little longer than the door and of a diameter
a little greater than the thickness of the door, terminating above and
below in pivots. These pivots turned in sockets made to receive them
in the threshold and lintel. To this cylinder the door was mortised,
their combined weight coming upon the lower pivot. The cut (Fig. 64)
makes this clear, and reminds one of an old-fashioned homemade gate.
The comedies are full of references to the creaking of these doors.
§216. The outer door of the house was properly called _iānua_, an
inner door _ōstium_, but the two words came to be used
indiscriminately, and the latter was even applied to the whole
entrance (§195). Double doors were called _forēs_, and the back door,
usually opening into a garden (§208), was called the _postīcum_. The
doors opened inwards and those in the outer wall were supplied with
bolts (_pessulī_) and bars (_serae_). Locks and keys by which the
doors could be fastened from without were not unknown, but were very
heavy and clumsy. Finally it should be noticed that in the interiors
of private houses doors were not nearly so common as now, the Romans
preferring portières (_vēla_, _aulaea_).
[Illustration: FIGURE 65. WINDOW]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account