The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of DickensNicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
General
The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of Dickens
Nicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
Cathedrals in literature; Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870. Mystery of Edwin Drood; Murder in literature
It is clear that Dickens has intended to convey the impression that
Edwin Drood is murdered, his body and clothes consumed, Jasper having
first taken his watch and chain and shirt-pin, which cannot have been
thrown into the river till the night of Christmas Day, since the
watch, wound up at twenty minutes past two on Christmas Eve, had run
down when found in the river.
Having arrived at this point we may proceed.
Is it conceivable that Jasper, believing himself to have succeeded in
murdering his nephew, could have failed? Jasper is meant by Dickens to
be a man wholly without conscience and heart. Such characters are not
numerous in Dickens’s books, but we have evidence that he knew them and
had pondered over them. I may quote his words in _Hunted Down_:
There is no greater mistake than to suppose that a man who is a
calculating criminal, is, in any phase of his guilt otherwise than
true to himself, and perfectly consistent with his whole character.
Such a man commits murder, and murder is the natural culmination of
his course; such a man has to outface murder, and will do it with
hardihood and effrontery. It is a sort of fashion to express
surprise that any notorious criminal, having such crime upon his
conscience, can so brave it out. Do you think that if he had it on
his conscience at all, or had a conscience to have it upon, he would
ever have committed the crime? Perfectly consistent with himself, as
I believe all such monsters to be, this Slinkton recovered himself,
and showed a defiance that was sufficiently cold and quiet. He was
white, he was haggard, he was changed; but only as a sharper who had
played for a great stake and had been outwitted and had lost the
game.
In _Household Words_ for 14th June 1856, Dickens has an article on ‘The
Demeanour of Murderers.’ He is referring to William Bousfield, ‘the
greatest villain that ever stood in the Old Bailey dock.’ Bousfield’s
demeanour was considered exceedingly remarkable because of his composure
under trial. On this Dickens says:
Can any one, reflecting on the matter for five minutes, suppose it
possible—we do not say probable, but possible—that in the breast of
this poisoner there were surviving, in the days of his trial, any
lingering traces of sensibility, or any wrecked fragment of the
quality which we call sentiment. Can the profoundest or the simplest
man alive believe that in such a heart there could have been left, by
that time, any touch of pity?
The murder of Edwin Drood had been so long premeditated that Jasper had
done it hundreds and thousands of times in the opium den. The motive was
his fierce and wolfish passion for Rosa. He loathed his poor nephew as
the chief obstacle to his wishes, and planned out in every detail a
murder which would utterly remove him from the sight of men.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account