The Progress of Ethnology: An Account of Recent Archaeological, Philological and Geographical Researches in Various Parts of the Globe, Tending to Elucidate the Physical History of ManBartlett, John Russell
History
The Progress of Ethnology: An Account of Recent Archaeological, Philological and Geographical Researches in Various Parts of the Globe, Tending to Elucidate the Physical History of Man
Bartlett, John Russell
Anthropology -- History; Ethnology -- History
[75] The Zend language is known to us chiefly by the "Zendavesta." Of
its antiquity there is doubt. Some philologists believe that it grew up
with the decline of the old Persian, or was formed on its basis, with an
infusion from the Sanscrit, Median, and Scythic languages. It was used
in the time of Darius Hystaspes, B.C. 550, at which period Zoroaster
lived, who employed the Zend in the composition of the "Zendavesta." Its
antiquity has formed the subject of many memoirs; but late writers,
among whom are Rask, Eugene Burnouf, Bopp, and Lassen, have decided from
the most severe tests of criticism, that the Zend was an ancient
language derived from the same source as the Sanscrit, and that it was
spoken before the Christian era, particularly in the countries situated
west of the Caspian Sea, in Georgia, Iran proper, and northern Media.
Note to the Dabistan, Vol. I. p. 222. The only specimen of this language
yet known, with the exception of a few MSS. of little importance among
the Parsees, is the Zendavesta. Major Rawlinson[A] adopts views at
variance with those of the distinguished German philologists, in regard
to the antiquity of the Zend language. Its "very elaborate vocalic
organization," he thinks, "indicates a comparatively recent era for the
formation of its alphabet;" and of the Zend-Avesta, he is of opinion
that "the disfigurement of authentic history affords an argument of
equal weight against the antiquity of its composition." He fully agrees,
however, with all others as to the very remote composition of the books
generally ascribed to Zoroaster. In fact this is beyond all question,
for Plato mentions them (Pol. B. XXX.). Clemens of Alexandria says they
were known in the 5th century B.C. and many other ancient writers could
be cited in proof of the same.[B]
[A] See Rawlinson. Memoir on Cuneiform Inscriptions. Note to page 42.
[B] See a note to the "Dabistan," Vol. I. p. in which is given a list
of all the ancient writers who mention Zoroaster and his works.
[76] On the Decyphering of the Median species of Arrow-headed Writing,
by N.L. Westergaard, in the Mémoires de la Société Royale des
Antiquaires du Nord. Copenhagen, 1844.
[77] Memoir on the Cuneiform Inscriptions, p. 20.
[78] Ibid. p. 28.
[79] On the Median variety of Arrow-headed Writing. Mémoires de la
Société des Antiquaires du Nord, for 1844. p. 272.
[80] Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes. 1844-45. Prof.
Westergaard has also published his paper in English, in the Mémoires de
la Société Royale des Antiquaires du Nord, Copenhagen, 1844, prefixing
to it Lassen's alphabet of the first sort of Persepolitan writing. He
was probably induced to do this by observing the limited extent to which
the German language is cultivated by English scholars, insomuch that
even Rawlinson complains that he was unable to read any more of Lassen's
papers than his translations of the inscriptions, which are in Latin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account