The Progress of Invention in the Nineteenth Century.Byrn, Edward W. (Edward Wright)
History
The Progress of Invention in the Nineteenth Century.
Byrn, Edward W. (Edward Wright)
Inventions -- History; Inventions -- History -- 19th century
in the intense cold, and upon examining it the next morning found it as
perfectly flexible as when he put it out. Goodyear had discovered the
process which afterwards came to be known as “vulcanization.” The
discovery was made in 1839, but was not accepted by those to whom it was
submitted as possessing any importance. Prof. Silliman, of Yale College,
however, in the fall of 1839 testified to the results claimed for it by
Mr. Goodyear--that it did not melt with heat, nor stiffen with the cold.
On June 15, 1844, Mr. Goodyear took out his celebrated patent, No.
3,633, covering this process, in which he not only used sulphur, but
added a proportion of white lead. The proportions named were 25 parts of
rubber, 5 parts of sulphur, and 7 parts of white lead, the ingredients
either to be ground in spirits of turpentine, or to be incorporated dry
between rolls. The odor imparted by the sulphur was to be destroyed by
washing with potash or vinegar. This patent was reissued in two
divisions Dec. 25, 1849, and again on Nov. 20, 1860, and was extended
for seven years from June 15, 1858, which was the end of the first term.
Under this patent two kinds of rubber were made and sold--“soft rubber,”
containing only a small proportion of sulphur, while the other, known as
the “vulcanite,” “ebonite,” or “hard rubber,” had from 25 to 35 per
cent. of sulphur and was subjected to a longer heat.
The history of this patent is a remarkable one. Immensely valuable as it
was, Goodyear reaped but a small share of the profit, for in the midst
of his poverty and necessities he was obliged to sell licenses and
establish royalties at a figure far below the real value of the rights
conveyed. Some idea of the great value of the business which Mr.
Goodyear had developed may be had from the fact that the companies who
held rights under the patent for the manufacture of shoes paid at one
time to Daniel Webster the enormous fee of $25,000 for defending their
patent interests.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account