The Progress of Invention in the Nineteenth Century.Byrn, Edward W. (Edward Wright)
History
The Progress of Invention in the Nineteenth Century.
Byrn, Edward W. (Edward Wright)
Inventions -- History; Inventions -- History -- 19th century
exhibiting an abnormal exhilaration. Dr. Horace Wells, a dentist of
Hartford, Conn., in 1844, had the gas administered, experimentally, to
himself during the operation of extracting a tooth, and was the
discoverer of its useful application as an anæsthetic.
The greatest discovery, however, in anæsthetics is the application of
ether for this purpose. Ether as a chemical product has been known for
several centuries, and as early as 1818 Faraday pointed out the
similarity between the effects of ether and nitrous oxide gas. Dr.
Morton, a dentist, of Boston, first applied it as an anæsthetic Oct. 16,
1846, being guided largely in its selection and use by Dr. Jackson, an
eminent chemist of the same city. On Nov. 12, 1846, U. S. Pat. No. 4,848
was issued to them for this invention. In the latter part of December of
the same year Dr. Liston, an eminent English surgeon, performed the
operation of amputating the thigh while the patient was under the
influence of ether.
Chloroform, discovered by Guthrie in 1831, was first applied as an
anæsthetic by Sir James Y. Simpson, of Edinburgh, in 1847. Of the two
leading anæsthetics, ether is more generally used in the United Sates
and chloroform in Europe. Ether is less dangerous, but its
administration is more difficult and disagreeable. It is said on the
highest authority that in the Crimean War chloroform was administered
25,000 times without a single death, and ether is even safer than
chloroform. In the hands of a skillful physician practically no danger
is to be apprehended from the use of either of the two agents. A little
over fifty years ago any severe or prolonged surgical operation involved
such irresistible pain that the patient’s writhings were required to be
restrained by powerful muscular assistants, and by straps which bound
the patient to the table, and when it is remembered that a false cut of
a hundredth part of an inch might be fatal, the haste, the disquieting
influence upon the surgeon, and the interference with the accuracy of
his hand, added greatly to the percentage of unsuccessful operations, as
well as to the prolonged agony of the patient. Contrast this with the
present methods of using anæsthetics, and we find the patient dropping
into a quiet and peaceful sleep before the operation, and awakening
thereafter to find, to his astonishment, that it is all over, and that
recovery is only a question of careful nursing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account