History, Modern -- 19th century; Nineteenth century
“Even the introduction of anæsthesia, however, did not rid
surgery of all its terrors. The acute pain of the operation was
abolished, but the after-suffering, as I know only too well,
in my early surgical days, was something dreadful to see. The
parched lips of the poor sufferer, tossing uneasily during
sleepless nights; wounds reeking with pus, and patients dying by
scores from blood-poisoning, from erysipelas, from tetanus, from
gangrene, were only too familiar sights in the pre-antiseptic
days. Then, again, there arose one of these deliverers of the
human race whose name can never be forgotten and whose fame will
last so long as time shall endure. Jenner, Warren, and Lister
are a triumvirate of names of which any profession may well be
proud. Thank God, they all sprang from virile Anglo-Saxon loins!
No praise, no reward, no fame is too great for them. That Lord
Lister still lives to see the triumph of his marvellous services
to humanity is a joy to all of us. And when the profession arose
_en masse_, within the last few years, at the International
Congress of Berlin, and at the meeting of the British Medical
Association in Montreal, and welcomed him with cheer after cheer,
it was but a feeble expression of gratitude for benefits which no
words can express.
“Before Lister’s day erysipelas, tetanus, gangrene, and
blood-poisoning in its various phases were the constant
attendant of every surgeon. They were dreaded guests at almost
any operation; and when in rare cases we obtained primary union
without a drop of pus, without fever, and with but little
suffering, it was a marvellous achievement. Now it is precisely
reversed. The surgeon who does not get primary union without
a drop of pus, with no fever, and with little suffering, asks
himself—what was the fault in my technic? To open the head, the
abdomen, or the chest thirty years ago was almost equivalent to
signing the death-warrant of a patient. The early mortality of
ovariotomy was about sixty per cent.; two out of three died. Now
many a surgeon can point to a series of one hundred abdominal
operations with a fatality of only two or three per cent. When
Sir Spencer Wells recorded his first one thousand cases of
ovariotomy it was calculated that after deducting the years which
the patients who died from the operation would have lived had no
operation been done the net result of the thousand cases was an
addition of twenty thousand years to human life. One thousand
ovariotomies under antiseptic precautions at the present would
certainly add at least thirty thousand years to human life. Would
not such a guerdon be enough for any man?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account