The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 1 of 2Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Science
The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 1 of 2
Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Patent medicines
A number of physicians who had given testimonials were asked in
writing whether the testimonials were genuine and whether they still
entertained the high opinion of Neurilla expressed at a former date.
Several replied that, if they had ever given such testimonials, they
had forgotten the circumstance. From the replies received we select the
following:
The testimonial which bears Dr. A’s name reads:
“_I am using Neurilla with most satisfactory results._”
Dr. A now says:
“=As to its positive value as a therapeutic agent I have not used
it enough to know.... If the language you quote ... appears as
given in or as a ‘testimonial’ it must in some way be garbled and
appears wholly without my knowledge or consent.=”
Dr. B is quoted as having written:
“_I do not often lend my influence to furthering the fame of a
proprietary remedy, but I have achieved such excellent results
from the use of Neurilla as a calmative in hysteria and other
nervous disorders, that I feel its manufacturers are entitled to an
acknowledgment of gratitude from me._”
Dr. B writes:
“=I have not prescribed a dose of the nostrum in years. The use of
my name in connection with Neurilla is unauthorized.=”
Dr. C once wrote:
“_I have used Neurilla with good results._”
Dr. C now writes:
=“In re ‘Neurilla’ I think I used the preparation once or twice and
it seemed to do good work, but if due to the preparation or other
influences, I am not able to verify. I have not used it since nor
will, as I am opposed to using these preparations except in certain
cases where the ℞ contains remedies whose value I have verified
under the most rigid tests.=
“=P. S. This testimonial must have been given many years ago.=”
Dr. D’s testimonial is admitted to be based on a single case:
“_I am using Neurilla in a bad case of neuralgic tic with very good
results on an aged lady. She has taken several bottles, and is
still taking it with very good results._”
Dr. D sums up his later experience by saying:
“=I have long since abandoned the use of Neurilla in practice.=”
The following bears Dr. E’s name:
“_I endorse Neurilla without hesitation. It meets all indications
for which it is intended._”
This is what Dr. E writes now:
“=As to the enclosed testimonial in regard to Neurilla said to
be written by me I have no recollection. I am not prescribing
Neurilla.=”
Dr. F’s experience is similar. The testimonial credited to him reads:
“_I have prescribed Neurilla in nervous disorders with good
results._”
Dr. F now writes:
“=I don’t remember of ever having prescribed ‘Neurilla’ or of
having given a testimonial for it or any other patent medicine if I
knew it to be so.=”
SUMMARY
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account