The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 1 of 2Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Science
The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 1 of 2
Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Patent medicines
Some time ago a comparison was made of the various methods proposed for
the valuation of preparations claimed to have amylolytic power. This
work was reported in The Journal,[22] and the method proposed for the
testing of diastase preparations now appears in New and Nonofficial
Remedies.[23] In view of the incorrect and exaggerated claims made
for Taka-Diastase, the Council in 1908 was obliged to rescind its
acceptance and to direct its omission from New and Nonofficial
Remedies. The report contained the following reference to Taka-Diastase
(Parke, Davis & Company), a product that had been accepted for
inclusion with New and Nonofficial Remedies:
[22] The Journal A. M. A., July 11, 1908, p. 140.
[23] New and Nonofficial Remedies, 1912, p. 68; The Journal A. M. A.,
April 15, 1911, Part 2, p. 18.
“The widest discrepancy between the values as claimed by the
manufacturer and those found by actual tests seems to be shown in
the case of Taka-Diastase. The liquid preparation has been tested a
number of times in different samples and has always been found weak.
Some samples, in fact, were quite inert. This ferment appears to lose
strength very rapidly in solution, as the manufacturers now concede.
The stability of the solid product is also far from satisfactory, and
appears to be less than that of the ferment as marketed some years
ago. The two samples examined recently were weak.”
More than three years have now elapsed since the publication of the
Council’s findings regarding Taka-Diastase--sufficient time, it is
believed, for the manufacturers to modify either their claims or the
product itself, and thus again make it eligible for inclusion with
New and Nonofficial Remedies. With this idea in mind new specimens of
Taka-Diastase and Liquid Taka-Diastase were purchased from a Chicago
drug house and the preparations reinvestigated. The following is the
report of this reinvestigation.
REPORT OF THE REEXAMINATION
In our report on the diastase preparations three years ago, it was
recommended that Taka-Diastase be removed from New and Nonofficial
Remedies, because the examinations showed that it did not have
the digestive strength claimed for it. This was true both for
Taka-Diastase itself and for Liquid Taka-Diastase. So far as the
latter was concerned, the starch-converting power was practically
_nil_ in those preparations which had been in the drug stores for
some months.
During the last few weeks new tests have been carried out with
several samples of the Taka-Diastase preparations and the results
obtained are essentially the same as those obtained in the former
examinations. The liquid preparation is still extremely weak in
starch-converting power, while we found that Taka-Diastase itself
would convert only 16.6 parts of pure anhydrous starch to the
colorless end-point in ten minutes, as explained below.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account